Abstract
Abstract
Background
Chronic disease management models of care provide an opportunity to assist home care clients to manage their disease burden. However, pragmatic trial management practices and lessons learned from such models are poorly illustrated in the literature.
Methods
We describe the processes of implementing a community-based cardiorespiratory self-management model, known as DIVERT-CARE, across the home care programs of three health regions in Canada. The DIVERT-CARE model is a multi-component complex intervention that identifies home care clients at the highest risk of deterioration and provides them with resources and capacity to manage their conditions. We conducted a retrospective analysis of baseline participant characteristics, needs assessments, reviewed findings from site visits and a national workshop with study partners, and examined other study documentation.
Results
Three home care regions in Canada participated in the study. A robust and data-driven review of each site was necessary to understand the local context, home care caseloads, structure of local systems, and intensity of resources, which influenced study processes. The creation of an intervention framework highlighted the need to adapt the intervention in a way that was sensitive to the local context while maintaining intervention outcomes.
Conclusion
Our detailed review showcases the relevant activities and on-the-ground steps needed to manage and conduct a multi-site pragmatic trial in home care. This example can help other researchers in implementing multi-disciplinary and multi-component care models for practice-based research.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Canadian Frailty Network
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference43 articles.
1. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ. 2000;320(7234):569–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7234.569.
2. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing Care for Patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350391.
3. Campbell MK, Snowdon C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, et al. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(iii):ix–105.
4. Farrell B, Kenyon S, Shakur H. Managing clinical trials. Trials. 2010;11(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-78.
5. Treweek S, Littleford R. Trial management- building the evidence base for decision-making. Trials. 2018;19(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2322-8.