Association of changes in frailty status with the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in older people: results from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS)

Abstract

Abstract Background Few studies have investigated the association between changes in frailty status and all-cause mortality, inconsistent results were reported. What’s more, studies that evaluated the effect of changes of frailty on cardiovascular death in older population are scanty. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the association of such changes with the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in older people, using data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Methods A total of 2805 older participants from two consecutive waves (i.e. 2011 and 2014) of the CLHLS were included for analysis. Based on the changes in frailty status from wave 2011 to wave 2014, participants were categorized into 4 subgroups, including sustained pre/frailty, robustness to pre/frailty, pre/frailty to robustness and sustained robustness. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death, and Cox regression analysis examined the association of changes in frailty status with outcomes. Results From wave 2011 to wave 2014, 33.2% of the participants had frailty transitions. From wave 2014 to wave 2018, there were 952 all-cause mortalities and 170 cardiovascular deaths during a follow-up of 9530.1 person-years, and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that cumulative incidences of the two outcomes were significantly lower in more robust participants (all log-rank p < 0.001). Compared with the subgroup of sustained pre/frailty, the fully adjusted HRs of all-cause mortality were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51–0.73, p < 0.001), 0.51 (95% CI: 0.42–0.63, p < 0.001) and 0.41 (0.34–0.49, p < 0.001) in the subgroup of robustness to pre/frailty, the subgroup of pre/frailty to robustness, and the subgroup of sustained robustness, respectively. The fully adjusted HRs of cardiovascular death were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.52–1.19, p = 0.256) in the subgroup of robustness to pre/frailty, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.26–0.76, p = 0.003) in the subgroup of pre/frailty to robustness and 0.51 (0.33–0.78, p = 0.002) in the subgroup of sustained robustness when comparing to the subgroup of sustained pre/frailty, respectively. Stratified analysis and extensive sensitivity analyses revealed similar results. Conclusions Frailty is a dynamic process, and improved frailty and remaining robust are significantly associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in older people.