Author:
Mitchell Lori,Poss Jeffrey,MacDonald Martha,Burke Rosanne,Keefe Janice M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In Canada, publicly-funded home care programs enable older adults to remain and be cared for in their home for as long as possible but they often differ in types of services offered, and the way services are delivered. This paper examines whether these differing approaches to care shape the pathway that home care clients will take. Older adult client pathways refer to trajectories within, and out of, the home care system (e.g., improvement, long term care (LTC) placement, death).
Methods
A retrospective analysis of home care assessment data (RAI-HC was linked with health administrative data, long-term care admissions and vital statistics in Nova Scotia Health (NSH) and Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA). The study cohort consists of clients age 60 + years, admitted to home care between January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 and up to four years from baseline. Differences in home care service use, client characteristics and their pathways were tested across the two jurisdictions overall, and among the four discharge streams within jurisdictions using t-tests and chi-square tests of significance.
Results
NS and WHRA clients were similar in age, sex, and marital status. NS clients had higher levels of need (ADL, cognitive impairment, CHESS) at base line and were more likely discharged to LTC (43% compared to 38% in WRHA). Caregiver distress was a factor correlated with being discharged to LTC. While a third remained as home care clients after 4 years; more than half were no longer in the community – either discharged to LTC placement or death. Such discharges occurred on average at around two years, a relatively short time period.
Conclusions
By following older clients over 4 years, we provide enhanced evidence of client pathways, the characteristics that influence these paths, as well as the length of time to the outcomes. This evidence is central to identification of clients at risk in the community and aids in planning for future home care servicing needs that will allow more older adults to remain living in the community.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference79 articles.
1. Compton RM, Olirus Owilli A, Caine V, Berendonk C, Jouan-Tapp D, Sommerfeldt S, et al. Home first: exploring the impact of community-based home care for older adults and their family caregivers. Can J Aging Rev Can Vieil. 2020;39(3):432–42.
2. Government of Canada. Shared health priorities and safe long-term care fund. 2017. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/transparency/health-agreements/shared-health-priorities.html.
3. Canadian Home Care Association. Better home care in Canada. A national action plan [Internet]. Canadian Home Care Association; 2016. Available from: https://cdnhomecare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Better-Home-Care-Report-web-EN.pdf.
4. Gilmour H. Formal home care use in Canada. Health Rep. 2018;29(9):3–9.
5. Johnson S, Bascu J, McIntosh T, Jeffery B, Novak N. Home care in Canada: An environmental scan. Regina (SK): Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, University of Regina and University of Saskatchewan; 2017. Available from: https://spheru.ca/publications/files/HomeCare_complexCare_environmental%20Scan18Oct2017.pdf.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献