Author:
Koponen Marjaana,Bell J. Simon,Lalic Samanta,Watson Rosie,Koivisto Anne M.,Ilomäki Jenni
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Guidelines highlight the importance of an individualized approach to treatment initiation for Parkinson’s disease. Our aim was to investigate initiation of anti-Parkinson medication in Australia from 2013–2018, and to determine factors predicting choice of initial treatment.
Methods
Cohort of new-users (N = 4,887) of anti-Parkinson medication aged ≥ 40 years were identified from a 10% random representative sample of national medication dispensing data from July-2013 to June-2018. Changes in treatment initiation were examined across the whole cohort and stratified by age and sex.
Results
Treatment initiation was most frequent with levodopa followed by non-ergot dopamine agonists (DAs) and anticholinergics. Two thirds initiated with levodopa across the study period. Initiation with non-ergot DAs increased from 22 to 27% (rate ratio, RR 1.23, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.02–1.47) and initiation with anticholinergics decreased from 6.9% to 2.4% (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21–0.55) from 2013–2018. Among persons aged ≥ 65 years, one third of women and one fourth of men initiated on levodopa. Among women aged < 65 years, rates of treatment initiation with DAs (37%) and levodopa (37%) were similar in 2013/2014 but initiation with DA exceeded levodopa thereafter. Among men aged < 65 years, treatment initiation with levodopa (44%-49%) remained more frequent than initiation with DAs (29%-32%) throughout the study period.
Conclusions
Treatment initiation with levodopa was most frequent among persons aged ≥ 65 years, consistent with current guidelines. Whilst the value of levodopa sparing strategies is unclear, treatment initiation with DA has become increasingly common relative to levodopa among women but not among men aged < 65 years.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference25 articles.
1. Grimes D, Gordon J, Snelgrove B, Lim-Carter I, Fon E, Martin W, et al. Canadian guidelines on Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39:S1–30.
2. Ferreira JJ, Katzenschlager R, Bloem BR, Bonuccelli U, Burn D, Deuschl G, et al. Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:5–15.
3. Chen S, Chan P, Sun S, Chen H, Zhang B, Le W, et al. The recommendations of Chinese Parkinson’s disease and movement disorder society consensus on therapeutic management of Parkinson’s disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2016;5:12.
4. NICE (the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), NICE guideline NG71: Parkinson’s disease in adults: diagnosis and management 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng71. Accessed 22 Jun 2020.
5. Working group appointed by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Neurological Society. Parkinson’s disease, Current Care Guidelines 2019. Helsinki: The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim [In Finnish]. https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi50042. Accessed 22 Jun 2020.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A case study exploration of Parkinson's disease;International Journal for Advancing Practice;2024-01-02