Genetic architecture of a pollinator shift and its fate in secondary hybrid zones of two Petunia species

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTheory suggests that the genetic architecture of traits under divergent natural selection influences how easily reproductive barriers evolve and are maintained between species. Divergently selected traits with a simple genetic architecture (few loci with major phenotypic effects) should facilitate the establishment and maintenance of reproductive isolation between species that are still connected by some gene flow. While empirical support for this idea appears to be mixed, most studies test the influence of trait architectures on reproductive isolation only indirectly.Petuniaplant species are, in part, reproductively isolated by their different pollinators. To investigate the genetic causes and consequences of this ecological isolation, we deciphered the genetic architecture of three floral pollination syndrome traits in naturally occurring hybrids between the widespreadPetunia axillarisand the highly endemic and endangeredP. exserta.ResultsUsing population genetics, Bayesian linear mixed modelling and genome-wide association studies, we found that the three pollination syndrome traits vary in genetic architecture. Few genome regions explain a majority of the variation in flavonol content (defining UV floral colour) and strongly predict the trait value in hybrids irrespective of interspecific admixture in the rest of their genomes. In contrast, variation in pistil exsertion and anthocyanin content (defining visible floral colour) is controlled by many genome-wide loci. Opposite to flavonol content, the genome-wide proportion of admixture between the two species predicts trait values in their hybrids. Finally, the genome regions strongly associated with the traits do not show extreme divergence between individuals representing the two species, suggesting that divergent selection on these genome regions is relatively weak within their contact zones.ConclusionsAmong the traits analysed, those with a more complex genetic architecture are best maintained in association with the species upon their secondary contact. We propose that this maintained genotype–phenotype association is a coincidental consequence of the complex genetic architectures of these traits: some of their many underlying small-effect loci are likely to be coincidentally linked with the actual barrier loci keeping these species partially isolated upon secondary contact. Hence, the genetic architecture of a trait seems to matter for the outcome of hybridization not only then when the trait itself is under selection.