Selection on the promoter regions plays an important role in complex traits during duck domestication
-
Published:2023-12-21
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1741-7007
-
Container-title:BMC Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Biol
Author:
Yin Zhong-Tao,Li Xiao-Qin,Sun Yun-Xiao,Smith Jacqueline,Hincke Maxwell,Yang Ning,Hou Zhuo-Cheng
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Identifying the key factors that underlie complex traits during domestication is a great challenge for evolutionary and biological studies. In addition to the protein-coding region differences caused by variants, a large number of variants are located in the noncoding regions containing multiple types of regulatory elements. However, the roles of accumulated variants in gene regulatory elements during duck domestication and economic trait improvement are poorly understood.
Results
We constructed a genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics map of the duck genome and assessed the evolutionary forces that have been in play across the whole genome during domestication. In total, 304 (42.94%) gene promoters have been specifically selected in Pekin duck among all selected genes. Joint multi-omics analysis reveals that 218 genes (72.01%) with selected promoters are located in open and active chromatin, and 267 genes (87.83%) with selected promoters were highly and differentially expressed in domestic trait-related tissues. One important candidate gene ELOVL3, with a strong signature of differentiation on the core promoter region, is known to regulate fatty acid elongation. Functional experiments showed that the nearly fixed variants in the top selected ELOVL3 promoter in Pekin duck decreased binding ability with HLF and increased gene expression, with the overexpression of ELOVL3 able to increase lipid deposition and unsaturated fatty acid enrichment.
Conclusions
This study presents genome resequencing, RNA-Seq, Hi-C, and ATAC-Seq data of mallard and Pekin duck, showing that selection of the gene promoter region plays an important role in gene expression and phenotypic changes during domestication and highlights that the variants of the ELOVL3 promoter may have multiple effects on fat and long-chain fatty acid content in ducks.
Funder
Key Technology Research and Development Program
National Natural Science Foundation of China
China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Plant Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Structural Biology,Biotechnology
Reference93 articles.
1. Brooker RM, Feeney WE. Animal domesticators. Curr Biol. 2019;29(22):R1168–9.
2. Frantz LAF, Bradley DG, Larson G, Orlando L. Animal domestication in the era of ancient genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21(8):449–60.
3. Wang GD, Xie HB, Peng MS, Irwin D, Zhang YP. Domestication genomics: evidence from animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014;2:65–84.
4. Trut L, Oskina I, Kharlamova A. Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model. BioEssays. 2009;31(3):349–60.
5. Georges M. Mapping, fine mapping, and molecular dissection of quantitative trait Loci in domestic animals. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:131–62.