A systematic review of the development and application of home cage monitoring in laboratory mice and rats
-
Published:2023-11-13
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1741-7007
-
Container-title:BMC Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Biol
Author:
Kahnau Pia, Mieske Paul, Wilzopolski Jenny, Kalliokoski Otto, Mandillo Silvia, Hölter Sabine M., Voikar Vootele, Amfim Adriana, Badurek Sylvia, Bartelik Aleksandra, Caruso Angela, Čater Maša, Ey Elodie, Golini Elisabetta, Jaap Anne, Hrncic Dragan, Kiryk Anna, Lang Benjamin, Loncarevic-Vasiljkovic Natasa, Meziane Hamid, Radzevičienė Aurelija, Rivalan Marion, Scattoni Maria Luisa, Torquet Nicolas, Trifkovic Julijana, Ulfhake Brun, Thöne-Reineke Christa, Diederich Kai, Lewejohann Lars, Hohlbaum KatharinaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Traditionally, in biomedical animal research, laboratory rodents are individually examined in test apparatuses outside of their home cages at selected time points. However, the outcome of such tests can be influenced by various factors and valuable information may be missed when the animals are only monitored for short periods. These issues can be overcome by longitudinally monitoring mice and rats in their home cages. To shed light on the development of home cage monitoring (HCM) and the current state-of-the-art, a systematic review was carried out on 521 publications retrieved through PubMed and Web of Science.
Results
Both the absolute (~ × 26) and relative (~ × 7) number of HCM-related publications increased from 1974 to 2020. There was a clear bias towards males and individually housed animals, but during the past decade (2011–2020), an increasing number of studies used both sexes and group housing. In most studies, animals were kept for short (up to 4 weeks) time periods in the HCM systems; intermediate time periods (4–12 weeks) increased in frequency in the years between 2011 and 2020. Before the 2000s, HCM techniques were predominantly applied for less than 12 h, while 24-h measurements have been more frequent since the 2000s. The systematic review demonstrated that manual monitoring is decreasing in relation to automatic techniques but still relevant. Until (and including) the 1990s, most techniques were applied manually but have been progressively replaced by automation since the 2000s. Independent of the year of publication, the main behavioral parameters measured were locomotor activity, feeding, and social behaviors; the main physiological parameters were heart rate and electrocardiography. External appearance-related parameters were rarely examined in the home cages. Due to technological progress and application of artificial intelligence, more refined and detailed behavioral parameters have been investigated in the home cage more recently.
Conclusions
Over the period covered in this study, techniques for HCM of mice and rats have improved considerably. This development is ongoing and further progress as well as validation of HCM systems will extend the applications to allow for continuous, longitudinal, non-invasive monitoring of an increasing range of parameters in group-housed small rodents in their home cages.
Funder
Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Plant Science,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Structural Biology,Biotechnology
Reference110 articles.
1. Crawley JN. What’s wrong with my mouse?: behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. 2. Crawley JN. Exploratory behavior models of anxiety in mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985;9:37–44. 3. Chesler EJ, Wilson SG, Lariviere WR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Mogil JS. Influences of laboratory environment on behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1101–2. 4. Crabbe JC, Wahlsten D, Dudek BC. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science. 1999;284:1670–2. 5. Schuessler BP, Zambetti PR, Kukuoka KM, Kim EJ, Kim JJ. The risky closed economy: a holistic, longitudinal approach to studying fear and anxiety in rodents. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14: 594568.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|