Abstract
AbstractThe energy sector is undergoing a fundamental transformation, with a significant investment in low-carbon technologies to replace fossil-based systems. In densely populated urban areas, deep boreholes offer an alternative over shallow geothermal systems, which demand extensive surface areas to attain large-scale heat production. This paper presents numerical calculations of the thermal energy that can be extracted from the medium-deep borehole heat exchangers in the low-enthalpy geothermal setting at depths ranging from 600 to 3000 m. We applied the thermogeological parameters of three locations across Finland and tested two types of coaxial borehole heat exchangers to understand better the variables that affect heat production in low-permeability crystalline rocks. For each depth, location, and heat collector type, we used a range of fluid flow rates to examine the correlation between thermal energy production and resulting outlet temperature. Our results indicate a trade-off between thermal energy production and outlet fluid temperature depending on the fluid flow rate, and that the vacuum-insulated tubing outperforms a high-density polyethylene pipe in energy and temperature production. In addition, the results suggest that the local thermogeological factors impact heat production. Maximum energy production from a 600-m-deep well achieved 170 MWh/a, increasing to 330 MWh/a from a 1000-m-deep well, 980 MWh/a from a 2-km-deep well, and up to 1880 MWh/a from a 3-km-deep well. We demonstrate that understanding the interplay of the local geology, heat exchanger materials, and fluid circulation rates is necessary to maximize the potential of medium-deep geothermal boreholes as a reliable long-term baseload energy source.
Funder
Business Finland: Smart Otaniemi subproject Smart integration of energy flexible buildings and local hybrid energy systems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economic Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference59 articles.
1. Aalto J, Pirinen P, Jylhä K. New gridded daily climatology of Finland: permutation-based uncertainty estimates and temporal trends in climate. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2016;121:3807–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024651.
2. Acuña J. Distributed thermal response tests New insights on U-pipe and Coaxial heat exchangers in groundwater-filled boreholes. KTH Royal Institute of Technology. 2013.
3. Arola T, Korhonen K, Martinkauppi A, Leppäharju N, Hakala P, Ahonen L, Pashkovskii M. Creating shallow geothermal potential maps for Finland using finite element simulations and machine learning. Eur Geotherm Congr. 2019;2019:6.
4. Arola T, Wiberg M. Geothermal energy use, country update for Finland, in: European Geothermal Congress 2022. European Geothermal Congress. 2022.
5. Artemieva IM. Lithosphere structure in Europe from thermal isostasy. Earth Sci Rev. 2019;188:454–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.11.004.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献