Abstract
Abstract
Background
In Ghana, the conversion of land to agriculture, especially across the vegetative belt has resulted in fragmented forest landscapes with increased interactions among humans, domestic animals, and wildlife.
Methods
We investigated viruses in bats and rodents, key reservoir hosts for zoonotic viral pathogens, in a small agricultural community in the vegetation belt of Ghana. We also administered questionnaires among the local community members to learn more about people’s awareness and perceptions of zoonotic disease risks and the environmental factors and types of activities in which they engage that might influence pathogen transmission from wildlife.
Results
Our study detected the RNA from paramyxoviruses and coronaviruses in rodents and bats, including sequences from novel viruses with unknown zoonotic potential. Samples collected from Epomophorus gambianus bats were significantly more likely to be positive for coronavirus RNA during the rainy season, when higher numbers of young susceptible individuals are present in the population. Almost all community members who responded to the questionnaire reported contact with wildlife, especially bats, rodents, and non-human primates in and around their homes and in the agricultural fields. Over half of the respondents were not aware or did not perceive any zoonotic disease risks associated with close contact with animals, such as harvesting and processing animals for food. To address gaps in awareness and mitigation strategies for pathogen transmission risks, we organized community education campaigns using risk reduction and outreach tools focused around living safely with bats and rodents.
Conclusions
These findings expand our knowledge of the viruses circulating in bats and rodents in Ghana and of the beliefs, perceptions, and practices that put community members at risk of zoonotic virus spillover through direct and indirect contact with bats and rodents. This study also highlights the importance of community engagement in research and interventions focused on mitigating risk and living safely with wildlife.
Funder
United States Agency for International Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451(7181):990–3.
2. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Socio-economic impact of COVID-19. United Nationals Development Programme (UNDP.org). Available from: https://www.Undp.Org/Coronavirus/Socio-Economic-Impact-Covid-19. Accessed 26 Dec 2021.
3. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard _ WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data 2021. Available from: https://Covid19.Who.Int/. Accessed 26 Dec 2021.
4. Lindahl JF, Grace D. The consequences of human actions on risks for infectious diseases: A review. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015;5(30048):1–11.
5. Molyneux D, Hallaj Z, Keusch GT, McManus DP, Ngowi H, Cleaveland S, et al. Zoonoses and marginalised infectious diseases of poverty: Where do we stand? Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-106.