Author:
Choy Ernest,Baraliakos Xenofon,Behrens Frank,D’Angelo Salvatore,de Vlam Kurt,Kirkham Bruce W.,Østergaard Mikkel,Schett Georg A.,Rissler Michael,Chaouche-Teyara Kamel,Perella Chiara
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Ishak KJ, Proskorovsky I, Benedict A. Simulation and matching-based approaches for indirect comparison of treatments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:537–49.
2. World Medical Association I. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107:403–5.
3. Leucht S, Chaimani A, Cipriani AS, Davis JM, Furukawa TA, Salanti G. Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;266:477–80.
4. Song F, Harvey I, Lilford R. Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:455–63.
5. Maksymowych W, Strand V, Baeten D, Nash P, Thom H, Cure S, et al. Secukinumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: comparative effectiveness results versus adalimumab using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(Suppl2):98.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献