Social pharmaceutical innovation and alternative forms of research, development and deployment for drugs for rare diseases

Author:

Douglas Conor M. W.ORCID,Aith Fernando,Boon Wouter,de Neiva Borba Marina,Doganova Liliana,Grunebaum Shir,Hagendijk Rob,Lynd Larry,Mallard Alexandre,Mohamed Faisal Ali,Moors Ellen,Oliveira Claudio Cordovil,Paterson Florence,Scanga Vanessa,Soares Julino,Raberharisoa Vololona,Kleinhout-Vliek Tineke

Abstract

AbstractRare diseases are associated with difficulties in addressing unmet medical needs, lack of access to treatment, high prices, evidentiary mismatch, equity, etc. While challenges facing the development of drugs for rare diseases are experienced differently globally (i.e., higher vs. lower and middle income countries), many are also expressed transnationally, which suggests systemic issues. Pharmaceutical innovation is highly regulated and institutionalized, leading to firmly established innovation pathways. While deviating from these innovation pathways is difficult, we take the position that doing so is of critical importance. The reason is that the current model of pharmaceutical innovation alone will not deliver the quantity of products needed to address the unmet needs faced by rare disease patients, nor at a price point that is sustainable for healthcare systems. In light of the problems in rare diseases, we hold that re-thinking innovation is crucial and more room should be provided for alternative innovation pathways. We already observe a significant number and variety of new types of initiatives in the rare diseases field that propose or use alternative pharmaceutical innovation pathways which have in common that they involve a diverse set of societal stakeholders, explicitly address a higher societal goal, or both. Our position is that principles of social innovation can be drawn on in the framing and articulation of such alternative pathways, which we term here social pharmaceutical innovation (SPIN), and that it should be given more room for development. As an interdisciplinary research team in the social sciences, public health and law, the cases of SPIN we investigate are spread transnationally, and include higher income as well as middle income countries. We do this to develop a better understanding of the social pharmaceutical innovation field’s breadth and to advance changes ranging from the bedside to system levels. We seek collaborations with those working in such projects (e.g., patients and patient organisations, researchers in rare diseases, industry, and policy makers). We aim to add comparative and evaluative value to social pharmaceutical innovation, and we seek to ignite further interest in these initiatives, thereby actively contributing to them as a part of our work.

Funder

Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Genetics (clinical),General Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. Commissioner O of the. Rare disease day 2020: FDA continues important work on treatments for rare diseases. FDA. 2020 Sept 9 [cited 2021 May 1]; https://www.fda.gov/news-events/fda-voices/rare-disease-day-2020-fda-continues-important-work-treatments-rare-diseases

2. Hurron J. New report finds medical treatments for rare diseases account for only 11% of US drug spending; nearly 80% of orphan products treat rare diseases exclusively. NORD (National Organization for Rare Disorders). 2021 [cited 2021 May 1]. https://rarediseases.org/new-report-finds-medical-treatments-for-rare-diseases-account-for-only-11-of-us-drug-spending-nearly-80-of-orphan-products-treat-rare-diseases-exclusively/

3. Dolgin E. Big pharma moves from “blockbusters” to “niche busters.” Nat Med. 2010;16(8):837–837.

4. Goldacre B. Are clinical trial data shared sufficiently today? No. BMJ. 2013;9(347): f1880.

5. Qian Y. Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978–2002. Rev Econ Stat. 2007;89(3):436–53.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3