Author:
Haddad Chadia,Sacre Hala,Obeid Sahar,Salameh Pascale,Hallit Souheil
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In clinical practice, quality of life measures can be used alongside some types of assessment to give valuable information that can identify areas that influence an individual and help the clinician make the best healthcare choices. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in a sample of Lebanese adults.
Methods
This cross-sectional study performed between July and November 2019 recruited 269 participants. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the reliability of the SF-12 questionnaire, and a factor analysis using the principal component analysis was performed to confirm its construct validity.
Results
The mean score for the “physical component summary (PCS-12)” was 50.27 ± 8.94 (95 % CI: 49.18–51.36) and for the “Mental component summary (MCS-12)” was 44.95 ± 12.17 (95 % CI: 43.47–46.43). A satisfactory Cronbach’s alpha was found for the two components: MCS (α = 0.707) and PCS (α = 0.743). The principal component analysis converged over a two-factor solution (physical and mental), explaining a total variance of 55.75 %. Correlations between the SF-12 scales and single items were significant, showing a good construct validity. The “physical functioning”, “role physical”, “bodily pain”, and “general health” subscales were highly associated with “PCS-12”, while the “vitality”, “social functioning”, “role emotional”, and “mental health” subscales were more associated with MCS-12.
Conclusions
The Arabic version of the SF-12 is a reliable, easy-to-use, and valid tool to measure health-related quality of life in the general population. Future studies using a larger sample size and focusing on questionnaire psychometric properties are necessary to confirm our findings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference32 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Measuring quality of life: The World Health Organization quality of life instruments (the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF). WHOQOL-measuring quality of life, 1997.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/concept.htm. [Last Accessed 13 Mar 2020]. 2018.
3. Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. Bmj. 2001;322(7297):1297–300.
4. World Health Organization, WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/index3.html. [Last Accessed 22 Mar 2020].
5. Dew M, Simmons R. The advantage of multiple measures of quality of life. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1990;131:23–30.
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献