Author:
Konnai Katsuyuki,Fujiwara Hiroyuki,Kitagawa Masakazu,Wakabayashi Reina,Yumori Asuna,Notomi Tsuguto,Onose Ryo,Kato Hisamori,Narimatsu Hiroto
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In April 2020, insurance coverage for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for breast cancer patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and BRCA testing were started in Japan. We investigated the impact of insurance coverage on the number of RRSO and BRCA tests performed.
Methods
The subjects were 370 breast cancer patients and 23 of their relatives who received genetic counseling at our institution between April 2014 and December 2021. Finally, 349 patients and 15 relatives were analyzed. We retrospectively compared the number of BRCA tests, RRSO, insurance status, and co-payment of medical expenses before and after insurance coverage based on medical records.
Results
In the 6-year pre-coverage period, 226 patients (mean: 37/year) received genetic counseling and 106 (17/year) received BRCA testing. In the 21-month post-coverage period, 161 patients (92/year) received genetic counseling and 127 (72/year) received BRCA testing. The rate of testing/counseling significantly increased in the post-coverage period (46.9% vs. 78.8%; p < .001). The number of patients who were diagnosed with HBOC were 24 (4/year) and 18 (10/year) and RRSO was performed for 7 (1/year) and 11 (6/year) patients in the pre- and post-coverage periods, respectively. The rate of RRSO/HBOC was significantly increased in the post-coverage period (29.1% vs. 61.1%; p = 0.039). RRSO patients' co-payment rates decreased from 64% to 25% pre- and post-coverage.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that decreased co-payments were the primary reason for these increases. Insurance coverage is an important factor when promoting preventive medical services such as RRSO.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference25 articles.
1. Chen S, Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1329–33.
2. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–75.
3. Xiao YL, Wang K, Liu Q, Li J, Zhang X, Li HY. Risk Reduction and Survival Benefit of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in Hereditary Breast Cancer: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19:e48–65.
4. Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, Ikechebelu JI, Ugwu EO, Okonkwo OO. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8:Cd012464.
5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic Version 1. 2022. 2021 Published online: E-Pub.