Overview of national health reporting in the EU and quality criteria for public health reports – results of the Joint Action InfAct

Author:

Thissen MartinORCID,Seeling Stefanie,Achterberg Peter,Fehr Angela,Palmieri Luigi,Tijhuis Mariken J.,Unim Brigid,Ziese Thomas

Abstract

Abstract Background Health reporting shall provide up-to-date health-related data to inform policy-makers, researchers and the public. To this end, health reporting formats should be tailored to the needs and competencies of the target groups and provide comparable and high-quality information. Within the Joint Action on Health Information ‘InfAct’, we aimed at gaining an overview of health reporting practices in the EU Member States and associated countries, and developed quality criteria for the preparation of public health reports. The results are intended to facilitate making health information adequately available while reducing inequalities in health reporting across the EU. Methods A web-based desk research was conducted among EU Member States and associated countries to generate an overview of different formats of national health reporting and their respective target groups. To identify possible quality criteria for public health reports, an exploratory literature review was performed and earlier projects were analysed. The final set of criteria was developed in exchange with experts from the InfAct consortium. Results The web-based desk research showed that public health reports are the most frequently used format across countries (94%), most often addressed to scientists and researchers (51%), politicians and decision-makers (41%). However, across all reporting formats, the general public is the most frequently addressed target group. With regards to quality criteria for public health reports, the literature review has yielded few results. Therefore, two earlier projects served as main sources: the ‘Evaluation of National and Regional Public Health Reports’ and the guideline ‘Good Practice in Health Reporting‘from Germany. In collaboration with experts, quality criteria were identified and grouped into eight categories, ranging from topic selection to presentation of results, and compiled in a checklist for easy reference. Conclusion Health reporting practices in the EU are heterogeneous across Member States. The assembled quality criteria are intended to facilitate the preparation, dissemination and access to better comparable high-quality public health reports as a basis for evidence-based decision-making. A comprehensive conceptual and integrative approach that incorporates the policy perspective would be useful to investigate which dissemination strategies are the most suitable for specific requirements of the targeted groups.

Funder

Robert Koch-Institut

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Thißen M, Seeling S. Research/ desk work on health reporting in member states. 2020. https://www.inf-act.eu/sites/inf-act.eu/files/2020-04/Milestone29_Task%208.3.ii_.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018.

2. Green LW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30(1):151–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049.

3. Fehr A, Hornbacher A, Seeling S, Thißen M. Prioritization in health information development. 2021. https://www.inf-act.eu/sites/inf-act.eu/files/2021-01/InfAct_Deliverable_5.3.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2021.

4. Wilson PM, Petticrew M, Calnan MW, Nazareth I. Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-91.

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Data Dissemination. 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fetp/training_modules/21/data-dissemination_ppt_final_09252013.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. European Health Information Portal: a one-stop shop for health information;European Journal of Public Health;2024-07-01

2. Innovative Methods Used in Monitoring COVID-19 in Europe: A Multinational Study;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-12-29

3. Monitoring Health Inequalities in 12 European Countries: Lessons Learned from the Joint Action Health Equity Europe;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-06-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3