Policy brief Belgian EBCP Mirror Group patient and citizen engagement

Author:

Van Hoof WannesORCID,Schittecatte Gabrielle,

Abstract

AbstractRights, preferences, needs and expectations of patients and citizens can only be respected and addressed if they are well understood. As such, a continuous, systematic and formalised dialogue between patients, citizens and policy makers is required to ensure ethical and socially appropriate cancer prevention, diagnostics, treatment and care. Relying on donations and project-based funding is not a sustainable way to ensure patient involvement and representativeness in policy. Patient organizations need long term, structural support to fulfil their role as patient representatives and support network in order to deliver the best possible service and to play their role as a professional representative of their disease-specific community. Inequalities can only be tackled if they are properly identified. This requires the definition of appropriate determinants fit for (inter)national comparison and extension and linkage of good quality data registries for cancer that allow the monitoring these inequalities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference7 articles.

1. Menager K, Maddocks J, Mathieu L, Richards R, Saelaert M, Van Hoof W. TEHDAS consultation: Citizens support the secondary use of health data when it matches their ethical values. Brussel: TEHDAS Consortium Partners; 2023 Mar. Available from: https://tehdas.eu/results/tehdas-consultation-citizens-support-the-secondary-use-of-health-data-when-it-matches-their-ethical-values/.

2. CCNE. Rapport de synthèse du comité consultatif National d’éthique ; Opinions du comité citoyen. 2018. Bruxelles: CCNE; 2018. Available from: https://www.ccne-ethique.fr/sites/default/files/2022-05/Rapport%20de%20synthe%CC%80se%20CCNE%20Bat.pdf. Cited 2023 Apr 23.

3. iPAAC. Patient pathways for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks. Available from: https://www.ipaac.eu/news-detail/en/59-patient-pathways-for-comprehensive-cancer-care-networks/. Cited 2023 Apr 2.

4. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):129.

5. Brunton G, Thomas J, O’Mara-Eves A, Jamal F, Oliver S, Kavanagh J. Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):944.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3