Abstract
Abstract
Background
Matched field-substitution has been applied in the Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS) since the first round. During data-collection, non-participating households are replaced by substitute households, if needed up to seven times. In this manuscript, the use of field-substitution in the six rounds of BHIS (1997–2018) is assessed. We investigated to what extent field-substitution contributes to obtaining the requested net-sample size and whether this has evolved throughout the successive BHIS’s.
Methods
Harmonized para-data gathered throughout de data-collection phases are used to define the final participation status of all households that could be contacted for participation to the survey. The share of the substituted households was calculated and possible trends in the use of field-substitution throughout the successive surveys was assessed using logistic regression. Finally, it was examined whether the application of field-substitution changed in terms of the position of the participating household in the clusters, using the ESTIMATE statement in the SAS procedure NLMIXED.
Results
Overall, four in ten participating households are substitute households. This proportion remains rather similar over the surveys. The probability of participating according to the position of the household within the cluster is evidently much higher in households at the first position of initial selected clusters. Over the survey-years, the share of participating household derived from substitute clusters in the total number of participating households has slightly increased.
Conclusion
Field-substitution in BHIS plays a very substantial role in obtaining the requested net sample both in size and composition. Field-substitution, as applied in BHIS might inspire scientists to consider it when developing their surveys.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference21 articles.
1. Van Oyen H, Tafforeau J, Hermans H, Quataert P, Schiettecatte E, Lebrun L, et al. The Belgian health interview survey. Arch Public Health. 1997;55:1–13.
2. Demarest S, Gisle L, Van der Heyden J. Playing hard to get: field substitutions in health surveys. Int J Public Health. 2007;52(3):188–9.
3. Demarest S, Molengerghs G, Van der Heyden J, Gisle L, Van Oyen H, de Waleffe S, et al. Sample substitution can be an acceptable data-collection strategy: the case of the Belgian health interview Survey. Int J Public Health. 2017.
4. Chapman DW. Substitution for missing units. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association; 1982. p. 76–84.
5. Chapman DW. To substitute or not to substitute that is the question. Survey Stat. 2003;48:32–4.