Author:
Gunathilaka Nayana,Semege Saveen,Pathirana Nishantha,Manamperi Nuwani,Udayanga Lahiru,Wijesinghe Harshima,Premaratne Prasad,Fernando Deepika
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The 30-year-old armed conflict in Sri Lanka resulted in a general breakdown of civil administration in the Northern and Eastern provinces, leading to mobilisation of many armed forces personnel to assist with reconstruction and resettlement. This occupational group has been identified as a priority risk group for leishmaniasis.
Methods
Individuals enlisted at all military establishments in Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi districts, Northern Province of Sri Lanka were included. Five thousand individuals were screened for skin lesions between September 2018 and August 2019. Persons with lesions suspected as cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) were further investigated. Information on sociodemographic/other potential risk factors was obtained through an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. The diagnosis was confirmed by microscopic visualization of parasitic stages from different samples obtained (skin scraping, lesion aspirate and tissue impression smears), histopathology and polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification.
Results
Among 5000 individuals screened, 74 individuals were suspected of having CL. Of these, 67.6% (n = 50) patients were confirmed for CL by microscopy. Around two third of both males (67.6%; n = 48) and females (66.6%; n = 2) were positive for Leishmania. The soldiers belonging to 26–35-year age group reported the highest susceptibility (83.3%; OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 3.49–6.20%). Of the sociodemographic factors, age, wearing short-sleeved upper body clothing as the uniform and non-use of insect repellents were identified as significant risk factors. Most of the CL patients had a single lesion (86.0%; n = 43) of an ulcerative type (34.0%; n = 17), mostly on their upper limb (67.9%; n = 34). Lesions were mostly 5–10 mm diameter (59.9%; n = 30) in size with poorly defined margins (72.0%; n = 36). Amongst the diagnostic techniques, microscopic examination of slit skin smear and tissue impression smear were able to discriminate the majority of patients (92.1%; n = 46) for CL.
Conclusions
In order to highlight the true burden of leishmaniasis in the military personnel, cases of leishmaniasis from military institutes should be recognized as a different entity per say and be included in the national figures so as to depict the real magnitude of the disease burden amongst this high-risk group.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference59 articles.
1. Alvar J, Velez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, Jannin J, den Boer M, The WHO Leishmaniasis Control Team. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35671.
2. WHO. The world health report 2004—changing history. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. https://www.who.int/whr/2004/en/. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.
3. WHO. Control of the leishmaniases, WHO technical report series 949. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2019.
4. Bora D. Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in India. Natl Med J India. 1999;12:62–8.
5. WHO. WHO report on global surveillance of epidemic-prone infectious diseases—leishmaniasis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/CSR_ISR_2000_1leish/en/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献