Author:
Zhao Si Yu,Wu Pei Lin,Fu Jun Yu,Wu Yi Ming,Liu Hong Kai,Cai Li Jun,Gu Jin Bao,Zhou Xiao Hong,Chen Xiao-Guang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Aedes albopictus is a major arbovirus vector with small stagnant water containers being its oviposition sites. Mosquitoes search for these sites based on their olfactory cues (odor and moisture emanating from the water at the oviposition site), visual cues (size and color of the site), and gustatory cues (ion and nutrient concentration in that water). The gustatory mechanism through which mosquitoes search for oviposition sites remains unknown.
Methods
To investigate the role of taste receptors in Ae. albopictus oviposition site selection, we developed a laboratory model. This model assessed mosquito behavior in locating and detecting oviposition sites, using a location index to quantify site preference and detection time to measure response to water presence. We compared oviposition site-searching efficiency between mosquitoes with blocked and unblocked appendages, targeting the taste organs. Transcriptome sequencing was conducted to identify differentially expressed genes between water-exposed and unexposed mosquitoes. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was then employed to generate a mutant strain with a targeted gene knockout.
Results
There was no significant difference between the blocked and unblocked groups in the location index. In contrast, the detection time of the unblocked group differed significantly from all other groups, including those with blocked foreleg tarsus, midleg tarsus, hindleg tarsus, all tibia, and all tarsus. Transcriptome sequencing analyses of water-exposed and unexposed mosquitoes revealed that the taste-related gene gustatory receptor 11(gr11) was differentially expressed. This gene was knocked out with CRISPR/Cas9 technology to generate a pure mutant strain with 2- and 4-bp deletions, which exhibited a significantly longer detection time than the wild-type strain.
Conclusions
This study reveals the role of Ae. albopictus gr11 in water detection at oviposition sites, thereby providing a theoretical basis and scientific guidelines for managing the breeding sites of these mosquitoes.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Key R&D Program of Guangdong Province
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Liu T, Xu Y, Wang XM, Gu JB, Yan GY, Chen XG. Antiviral systems in vector mosquitoes. Dev Comp Immunol. 2018;83:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2017.12.025.
2. Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Zika virus mosquito vectors: competence, biology, and vector control. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:S976–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix405.
3. Mondet B, da Rosa AP, Vasconcelos PF. The risk of urban yellow fever outbreaks in Brazil by dengue vectors. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique (1990). 1996;89:107–13.
4. Bentley MD, Day JF. Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annu Rev Entomol. 1989;34:401–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.002153.
5. Davis EE. Olfactory control of mosquito behaviour. Ciba Found Symp. 1996;200:48–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470514948.ch5.