Author:
Dos Santos Quinton Marco,Avenant-Oldewage Annemariè
Abstract
Abstract
The use of molecular tools in the study of parasite taxonomy and systematics have become a substantial and crucial component of parasitology. Having genetic characterisation at the disposal of researchers has produced mostly useful, and arguably more objective conclusions. However, there are several groups for which limited genetic information is available and, coupled with the lack of standardised protocols, renders molecular study of these groups challenging. The Diplozoidae are fascinating and unique monogeneans parasitizing mainly freshwater cyprinid fishes in Europe, Asia and Africa. This group was studied from a molecular aspect since the turn of the century and as such, limitations and variability concerning the use of these techniques have not been clearly defined. In this review, all literature and molecular information, primarily from online databases such as GenBank, were compiled and scrupulously analysed for the Diplozoidae. This was done to review the information, detect possible pitfalls, and provide a “checkpoint” for future molecular studies of the family. Hindrances detected are the availability of sequence data for only a limited number of species, frequently limited to a single sequence per species, and the heavy reliance on one non-coding ribosomal marker (ITS2 rDNA) which is difficult to align objectively and displays massive divergences between taxa. Challenging species identification and limited understanding of diplozoid species diversity and plasticity are also likely restricting factors, all of which hamper the accurate taxonomic and phylogenetic study of this group. Thus, a more integrated taxonomic approach through the inclusion of additional markers, application of more rigorous morphological assessment, more structured barcoding techniques, alongside thorough capturing of species descriptions including genetypes, genophore vouchers and reference collections in open sources are encouraged. The pitfalls highlighted are not singular to the Diplozoidae, and the study of other groups may benefit from the points raised here as well.
Funder
National Research Foundation
Faculty Research Committee, University of Johannesburg
University Research Committee, University of Johannesburg
University of Johannesburg Global Excellence and Stature Postdoctoral Fellowship
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference65 articles.
1. Anderson RM. An analysis of the influence of host morphometric features on the population dynamics of Diplozoon paradoxum (Nordmann, 1832). J Anim Ecol. 1974;43:873–87.
2. Gläser HJ, Gläser B. Zur Taxonomie von Diplozoon Normann, 1832. Zeitschr Parasitenkd. 1964;25:164–92.
3. Khotenovsky IA. Suborder Octomacrinea Khotenovsky. In: Scarlato OA, editor. Fauna of the USSR. Monogenea. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute; 1985.
4. Matejusová I, Koubková B, D’Amelia S, Cunningham CO. Genetic characterization of six species of diplozoids (Monogenea; Diplozoidae). Parasitology. 2001;123:465–74.
5. Thomas JD. A new monogenetic Trematode, Diplozoon ghanense, sp. nov. (Polyopisthocotylea: Discocotylea) from the West African freshwater fish Alestes macrolepidotus (C. & V., 1849), in West Africa. J West Afr Sci Assoc. 1957;1957(3):178–82.