Author:
Križmarić Miljenko,Maver Uroš,Zdravković Marko,Mekiš Dušan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fresh gas decoupling is a feature of the modern anesthesia workstation, where the fresh gas flow (FGF) is diverted into the reservoir bag and is not added to the delivered tidal volume, which thus remains constant. The present study aimed to investigate the entraining of the atmospheric air into the anesthesia breathing circuit in case the reservoir bag was disconnected.
Methods
We conducted a simulator-based study, where the METI HPS simulator was connected to the anesthesia workstation. The effect of the disconnected reservoir bag was evaluated using oxygen (O2) and air or oxygen and nitrous oxide (N2O) as a carrier gas at different FGF rates. We disconnected the reservoir bag for 10 min during the maintenance phase. We recorded values for inspiratory O2, N2O, and sevoflurane. The time constant of the exponential process was estimated during reservoir bag disconnection.
Results
The difference of O2, N2O and sevoflurane concentrations, before, during, and after reservoir bag disconnection was statistically significant at 0.5, 1, and 2 L/min of FGF (p < 0.001). The largest decrease of the inspired O2 concentrations (FIO2) was detected in the case of oxygen and air as the carrier gas and an FGF of 1 L/min, when oxygen decreased from median [25th–75th percentile] 55.00% [54.00–56.00] to median 39.50% [38.00–42.50] (p < 0.001). The time constant for FIO2 during reservoir bag disconnection in oxygen and air as the carrier gas, were median 2.5, 2.5, and 1.5 min in FGF of 0.5, 1.0, and 2 L/min respectively.
Conclusions
During the disconnection of the anesthesia reservoir bag, the process of pharmacokinetics takes place faster compared to the wash-in and wash-out pharmacokinetic properties in the circle breathing system. The time constant was affected by the FGF rate, as well as the gradient of anesthetic gases between the anesthesia circle system and atmospheric air.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference23 articles.
1. Gravenstein N, Banner MJ, McLaughlin G. Tidal volume changes due to the interaction of anesthesia machine and anesthesia ventilator. J Clin Monit. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01695941.
2. Biro P. The influence of fresh-gas decoupling on the performance of the Draegar Sulla 808V anesthesia ventilator. Anaesthesist. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050491.
3. Rothschiller JL, Uejima T, Dsida RM, Coté CJ. Evaluation of a new operating room ventilator with volume-controlled ventilation: the Ohmeda 7900. Anesth Analg. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199901000-00008.
4. Fösel T, Schirmer U, Wick C, Pfenninger E, Siegler W, Altemeyer KH. Mechanical ventilation in an anesthetic circle system using the lowest tidal volume – studies of 3 anesthesia ventilators in a lung model and an animal experiment. Anaesthesist. 1991;40:624–8.
5. Bokoch MP, Weston SD. Inhaled anesthetics: delivery systems. In: Gropper M, Eriksson L, Fleisher L, Wiener-Kronish J, Cohen N, Leslie K, editors. Miller’s anesthesia. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019. p. 572–637.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献