Author:
Luo Shuzhi,Chen Zhaowen,Wang Xujian,Zhu Changyu,Su Shili
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) effectively relieves the labor pain, but it is still not available consistently for multiparous women in many institutions because of their obviously shortened labor length.
Methods
A total of 811 multiprous women were retrospective enrolled and firstly divided into two groups: LEA group or non-LEA group. And then they were divided into seven subgroups and analyzed according to the use of LEA and cervical dilation. The primary outcomes (time intervals, blood loss and Apgar scores) and secondary outcomes (maternal demographic characteristics and birth weight) were collected by checking electronic medical records.
Results
The prevalence of using LEA in multiprous women was 54.5 %. Using LEA significantly lengthened the duration of labor stage by 56 min (P < 0.001), increased the blood loss (P < 0.001) and lowered Apgar scores (P = 0.001). In the comparison of sub-group analysis, using LEA can obviously prolong the duration of first-second stage in women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.014), while there was no significant difference with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.69). Using LEA can significantly increased the blood loss when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P < 0.001) and 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.035), meanwhile there were no significantly differences in the women with 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.524). Using LEA can significantly lower the Apgar scores when the initiation of LEA in the women with 2 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.001) and 4 cm or more cervical dilation (P = 0.025), while there were no significantly differences in the women with 3 cm cervical dilation (P = 0.839).
Conclusions
Labor epidural analgesia for the multiparous woman may alter progress of labor, increase postpartum blood loss and lower Apgar scores. Early or late initiation of LEA should be defined as with cervical dilatation of less or more than 3 cm and the different effect should be understand.
Trial registration
ChiCTR2100042746. Registered 27 January 2021-Prospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn.
Funder
Projects of medical and health technology development program in Shandong province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Wang Q, Zheng SX, Ni YF, et al. The effect of labor epidural analgesia on maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:89–96.
2. Souza MA, Cecatti JG, Guida JP, et al. Analgesia for vaginal birth: Secondary analysis from the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152:401–08.
3. Høtoft D, Maimburg RD. Epidural analgesia during birth and adverse neonatal outcomes: A population-based cohort study [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 18]. Women Birth. 2020;S1871-5192(20):30265–1.
4. Chau A, Tsen LC. Update on Modalities and Techniques for Labor Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia. Adv Anesth. 2018;36:139–62.
5. Herrera-Gómez A, De Luna-Bertos E, Ramos-Torrecillas J, Ocaña-Peinado FM, Ruiz C. García-Martínez O. Risk Assessments of Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Delivery. Clin Nurs Res. 2018;27:841–52.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献