Sciatic obturator femoral technique versus spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. A randomised trial

Author:

Shokri Hoda,Kasem Amr A.

Abstract

Abstract Background Peripheral nerve block is preferable for lower extremity surgery because it sufficiently blocks pain pathways at different levels providing excellent anaesthesia at the site of surgery. We designed this study to compare the efficacy and safety of SOFT block (sciatic-obturator-femoral technique) compared with spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. Methods One hundred and seven patients ASA I, II scheduled for fixation of open tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either spinal anaesthesia or SOFT block. In spinal anaesthesia group, patients received spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (7. 5-10mg). In SOFT group, patients received SOFT block with bupivacaine 0.25%. Primary endpoint included the duration of analgesia. The secondary endpoints included patient satisfaction scores, visual analogue scores, incidence of adverse events as vomiting, systemic toxicity from local anaesthetic drug and time to first effect of the techniques. Results The duration of SOFT block and time to first analgesic dose in SOFT group was significantly longer (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding satisfaction scores, the incidence of cardiovascular collapse, seizures and paraesthesia. Pain scores were significantly lower in SOFT group at 3,6,12 h postoperative (p < 0.001). The time to the first effect was significantly longer in SOFT group (p < 0.001). Conclusion SOFT is a feasible technique of local anaesthesia for control of postoperative pain with unremarkable adverse events compared with spinal anaesthesia, in patients undergoing fixation of tibial fractures using Ilizarov external fixator. Trial registration This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. registry number: NCT03450798 on February 20, 2018.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Lumb AB. Anesthesia for vascular surgery on extremities. Anesth Intensive Care Med. 2004 June;5:207–2 10.

2. Mansour A. Femoral Nerve Block versus Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Peripheral Vascular Surgery. AJAIC. 2006;(9) No. 1.

3. Spasiano A, Flore I, Pesamosca A, Della RG. Comparison between spinal anaesthesia and sciatic-femoral block for arthroscopic knee surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73:13–21. 17159764.

4. Sato K, Sai S, Shirai N, Adachi T. Ultrasound guided Obturator versus sciatic nerve block in addition to continuous femoral nerve block for analgesia after Total knee Arthroplasty. Jpn Clin Med. 2011;2:29–34.

5. Taha AM, Darwich N. SOFT block (Sciatic, Obturator and Femoral nerve block Technique): a single-puncture, sole anesthetic for knee surgery. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2017;64:1279–81.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3