Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit

Author:

Hayasaka TatsuyaORCID,Kawano Kazuharu,Onodera Yu,Suzuki Hiroto,Nakane Masaki,Kanoto Masafumi,Kawamae Kaneyuki

Abstract

Abstract Background This study used an epidural anesthesia practice kit (model) to evaluate the accuracy of epidural anesthesia using standard techniques (blind) and augmented/mixed reality technology and whether visualization using augmented/mixed reality technology would facilitate epidural anesthesia. Methods This study was conducted at the Yamagata University Hospital (Yamagata, Japan) between February and June 2022. Thirty medical students with no experience in epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups, with 10 students in each group. Epidural anesthesia was performed using the paramedian approach with an epidural anesthesia practice kit. The augmented reality (-) group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ and the augmented reality (+) group with HoloLens2Ⓡ. The semi-augmented reality group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ after 30 s of image construction of the spine using HoloLens2Ⓡ. The epidural space puncture point distance between the ideal insertion needle and participant’s insertion needle was compared. Results Four medical students in the augmented reality (-), zero in the augmented reality (+), and one in the semi-augmented reality groups failed to insert the needle into the epidural space. The epidural space puncture point distance for the augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups were 8.7 (5.7–14.3) mm, 3.5 (1.8–8.0) mm (P = 0.017), and 4.9 (3.2–5.9) mm (P = 0.027), respectively; a significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusions Augmented/mixed reality technology has the potential to contribute significantly to the improvement of epidural anesthesia techniques.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3