Author:
Zhang Xiang,Wang Xiao-Dong,Cui Wei,Gao Shun-Cai,Yang Xu-Dong,Xia Bin
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Awake extubation and deep extubation are commonly used anesthesia techniques. In this study, the safety of propofol-assisted deep extubation in the dental treatment of children was assessed.
Materials and methods
Children with severe caries who received dental treatment under general anesthesia and deep extubation between January 2017 and June 2023 were included in this study. Data were collected on the following variables: details and time of anesthesia, perioperative vital signs, and incidence of postoperative complications. The incidence of laryngeal spasm (LS) was considered to be the primary observation indicator.
Results
The perioperative data obtained from 195 children undergoing dental treatment was reviewed. The median age was 4.2 years (range: 2.3 to 9.6 years), and the average duration of anesthesia was 2.56 h (range 1 to 4.5 h). During intubation with a videoscope, purulent mucus was found in the pharyngeal cavity of seven children (3.6%); LS occurred in five of them (2.6%), and one child developed a fever (T = 37.8 °C) after discharge. Five children (2.6%) experienced emergence agitation (EA) in the recovery room. Also, 13 children (6.7%) experienced epistaxis; 10 had a mild experience and three had a moderate experience. No cases of airway obstruction (AO) and hypoxemia were recorded. The time to open eyes (TOE) was 16.3 ± 7.2 min. The incidence rate of complications was 23/195 (11.8%). Emergency tracheal reintubation was not required. Patients with mild upper respiratory tract infections showed a significantly higher incidence of complications (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Propofol-assisted deep extubation is a suitable technique that can be used for pediatric patients who exhibited non-cooperation in the outpatient setting. Epistaxis represents the most frequently encountered complication. Preoperative upper respiratory tract infection significantly increases the risk of complications. The occurrence of EA was notably lower than reported in other studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Huang RC, Hung NK, Lu CH, Wu ZF. Removal of laryngeal mask airway in adults under Target-Controlled, propofol-fentanyl infusion Anesthesia: Awake or Deep Anesthesia? Med (Baltim). 2016;95(17):e3441.
2. Koo CH, Lee SY, Chung SH, Ryu JH. Deep vs. awake extubation and LMA removal in terms of airway complications in pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2018;7(10):353.
3. Koo CH, Lee SY, Chung SH, Ryu JH. Deep vs. awake extubation and LMA removal in terms of Airway complications in Pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia: a systemic review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2018;7(10).
4. Wu X, Liu Y, Li B, Zhou D, Cheng T, Ma T et al. Safety of deep intravenous propofol sedation in the dental treatment of children in the outpatient department. (2213–8862 (Electronic)).
5. Kuratani N, Oi Y. Greater incidence of emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane anesthesia as compared with halothane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(2):225–32.