Author:
Men Xin,Wang Qian,Dong Jia-fu,Chen Pei,Qiu Xiao-xiao,Han Yin-qiu,Wang Wei-long,Zhou Jin,Shou Hong-yan,Zhou Zhen-feng
Abstract
Abstract
Background
3% chloroprocaine (CP) has been reported as the common local anesthetic used in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. However, 0.75% ropivacaine is considered a promising and effective alternative. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of 0.75% ropivacaine with 3% chloroprocaine for extended epidural anesthesia in pregnant women.
Methods
We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center study from November 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. We selected forty-five pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period and randomized them to receive either 0.75% ropivacaine or 3% chloroprocaine in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the time to loss of cold sensation at the T4 level.
Results
There was a significant difference between the two groups in the time to achieve loss of cold sensation (303, 95%CI 255 to 402 S vs. 372, 95%CI 297 to 630 S, p = 0.024). There was no significant difference the degree of motor block (p = 0.185) at the Th4 level. Fewer pregnant women required additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group compared to the chloroprocaine group (4.5% VS. 34.8%, p = 0.011). The ropivacaine group had lower intraoperative VAS scores (p = 0.023) and higher patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.040) than the chloroprocaine group. The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar between the two groups, and no serious complications were observed.
Conclusions
Our study found that 0.75% ropivacaine was associated with less intraoperative pain treatment, higher patient satisfaction and reduced the onset time compared to 3% chloroprocaine in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. Therefore, 0.75% ropivacaine may be a suitable drug in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period.
Clinical trial number and registry URL
The registration number: ChiCTR2200065201; http://www.chictr.org.cn, Principal investigator: MEN, Date of registration: 31/10/2022.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Butwick AJ, Wong CA, Guo N. Maternal body Mass Index and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia: a Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(3):448–58.
2. Hu X, Xiong D, Luo M, et al. Retrospective analysis on the efficacy of epidural labor analgesia on early breast feeding after vaginal delivery. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):413.
3. La Camera G, La Via L, Murabito P, et al. Epidural analgesia during labour and stress markers in the newborn. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(5):690–2.
4. Gizzo S, Noventa M, Fagherazzi S, et al. Update on best available options in obstetrics anaesthesia: perinatal outcomes, side effects and maternal satisfaction. Fifteen years systematic literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):21–34.
5. Davis AG. Anaesthesia for caesarean section. The potential for regional block. Anaesthesia. 1982;37(7):748–53.