Author:
Mankute Aida,Juozapaviciene Laima,Stucinskas Justinas,Dambrauskas Zilvinas,Dobozinskas Paulius,Sinz Elizabeth,Rodgers David L.,Giedraitis Mantas,Vaitkaitis Dinas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Simulation-based training is a clinical skill learning method that can replicate real-life situations in an interactive manner. In our study, we compared a novel hybrid learning method with conventional simulation learning in the teaching of endotracheal intubation.
Methods
One hundred medical students and residents were randomly divided into two groups and were taught endotracheal intubation. The first group of subjects (control group) studied in the conventional way via lectures and classic simulation-based training sessions. The second group (experimental group) used the hybrid learning method where the teaching process consisted of distance learning and small group peer-to-peer simulation training sessions with remote supervision by the instructors. After the teaching process, endotracheal intubation (ETI) procedures were performed on real patients under the supervision of an anesthesiologist in an operating theater. Each step of the procedure was evaluated by a standardized assessment form (checklist) for both groups.
Results
Thirty-four subjects constituted the control group and 43 were in the experimental group. The hybrid group (88%) showed significantly better ETI performance in the operating theater compared with the control group (52%). Further, all hybrid group subjects (100%) followed the correct sequence of actions, while in the control group only 32% followed proper sequencing.
Conclusions
We conclude that our novel algorithm-driven hybrid simulation learning method improves acquisition of endotracheal intubation with a high degree of acceptability and satisfaction by the learners’ as compared with classic simulation-based training.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, Desousa S, Lam-McCulloch J. Applying theory to practice in undergraduate education using high fidelity simulation. Med Teach. 2006;28(1):e10–5.
2. Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Larmon BR, McCullough L, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151–7.
3. Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, Klimek M, Stolker RJ. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2016;99:63–71.
4. Kudreviciene A, Nadisauskiene R, Tameliene R, Garcinskiene J, Nedzelskiene I, Tamelis A, et al. New HybridLab training method of clinical skills learning in neonatology: students’ opinion. MedEdPublish. 2016;5(2):41.
5. Ignatavicius P, Gudaityte R, Dobozinskas P, Vaitkaitis D, Krikscionaitiene A, Dambrauskas Z. The novel platform for self-directed peer-to-peer medical simulation for development of the technical and non-technical competences. Ann Surg Educ. 2019;1:1001.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献