Abstract
Abstract
Background
In this study, the μ-Opioid receptor activity was assessed pre-operatively for its association with postoperative pain level and second analgesic requirement in patients undergoing septoplasty.
Methods
In our prospective study, 120 adult patients underwent septoplasty from June 2015 to January 2019 were randomly divided into 2 pre-operative groups. The first group (n = 60) was patients given tramadol (1–2 mg/kg) for post-operative analgesia, and the second group (control group) (n = 60) was initially prescribed only fentanyl (1 μg/ kg-i.v.) in the induction. Acetaminophen with codeine analgesic 325/30 mg (p.o.) was used as an rescue painkiller in the post-operative period. The μ-Opioid receptor activity was investigated in pre-operative blood samples and compared to post-operative pain level and time required for second round of analgesic administration. The visual analogue score (VAS) was used to evaluate the post-operative pain degree (0 no pain; 10 worst pain). The patients’ post-operative VAS scores were evaluated upon arrival to recovery room, and at the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 10th, and 24th hour post-operative period.
Results
Demographic data and peri-operative variables were similar in both study group (p < 0.05).There was no significant difference between the receptor levels in both groups and the mean receptor level was 200.94 ± 15.34 pg/mL (max:489.92 ± 22.36 pg/mL, min: 94.56 ± 11.23 pg/mL).In patients who used tramadol as the levels of μ-Opioid receptors increased, VAS scores of patients and second analgesic use decreased in post-operative period.The VAS scores in patients with higher receptor levels were lower in the recovery room (p < 0.05), 1st (p < 0.05) and 3rd hours (p < 0.05).The VAS scores were lower in the tramadol group compared to the control group (p < 0.05).Number of secondary analgesic requirement was significantly lower in patients of the tramadol group with higher receptor levels compared to the ones with lower receptor (p < 0.05) for arrival at the recovery room and 1st hour. Patients in the tramadol group needed a second pain killer much later than patients in the control group.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrates that patients with higher μOR levels have a higher efficacy of opioid analgesic agents and an lesser need for additional analgesic agents.
Trial registration
This trial was registered retrospectively (The ACTRN: ACTRN12619001652167, registration date: 26/11/2019).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel and rapid rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:719–22.
2. Gillen C, Haurand M, Kobelt DJ, Wnendt S. Affinity, potency and efficacy of tramadol and its metabolites at the cloned human mu-opioid receptor. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:116–21.
3. Tsai YC, Won SJ. Effects of tramadol on T lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity in rats with sciatic constriction injury. Pain. 2001;92:63–9.
4. Minami K, Uezono Y, Ueta Y. Pharmacological aspects of the effects of tramadol on Gprotein coupled receptors. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007;103:253–60.
5. Raffa RB, Friderichs E. Profile of tramadol and tramadol analog. In: Bountra C, Munglani R, Schmidt K, editors. Pain-current understanding, emerging therapies, and novel approaches to drug discovery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 731–42.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献