Abstract
Abstract
Background
Emergencies have a great impact on infant and young child feeding. Despite the evidence, the recommended feeding practices are often not implemented in the emergency response, undermining infant and maternal health. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant and lactating women during the earthquake emergency that occurred in L’Aquila on 6 April 2009.
Methods
The study design was qualitative descriptive. Data were collected by individual semi-structured interviews, investigating the mother’s experiences of pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, infant formula or complementary feeding during the emergency and the post emergency phase. Data analysis was categorical and was performed by using N-Vivo software.
Results
Six women who were pregnant at the time of the earthquake were interviewed in January 2010. In addition to the essential needs of pregnant and lactating women, such as those related to the emergency shelters conditions, the main findings emerged from this study were: the reconfiguration of relationships and the central role of partners and family support; the need of spaces for sharing experiences and practices with other mothers; the lack of breastfeeding support after the hospital discharge; the inappropriate donations and distribution of Breast Milk Substitutes.
Conclusions
During and after L’Aquila earthquake, several aspects of infant and young child feeding did not comply with standard practices and recommendations. The response system appeared not always able to address the specific needs of pregnant and lactating women. It is urgent to develop management plans, policies and procedures and provide communication, sensitization, and training on infant and young child feeding at all levels and sectors of the emergency response.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference63 articles.
1. Sphere Association. The sphere handbook: humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. Geneva: CHS Alliance, Sphere Association and Groupe URD; 2018.
2. Below R, Wirtz A, Re M. Disaster category classification and peril terminology for operational purposes. Common accord Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and Munich Reinsurance Company (Munich RE). 2009. https://www.cred.be/node/564. Accessed 7 May 2020.
3. European Environment Agency. Mapping the impacts of natural hazards and technological accidents in Europe. 2010. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/mapping-the-impacts-of-natural. Accessed 5 May 2020.
4. European Environment Agency. Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction in Europe. 2017. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate-change-adaptation-and-disaster. Accessed 5 May 2020.
5. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction; 2015. Accessed 7 May 2020.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献