Author:
Pilime Sukoluhle,Jewett Sara
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Globally, there has been a decline in breastfeeding rates. This has resulted in increased infant mortality due to infectious diseases and inappropriate feeding practices. The aggressive marketing of breastmilk substitutes (BMS) by manufacturers has contributed, in part, to these declines. With the progressive use of social media, marketing has shifted from traditional methods to the use of influencers, who command a huge following on their social media accounts and influence the daily decisions of their followers. This study investigates the infant feeding methods and associated products promoted by South African influencers in relation to crying and sleeping and their followers’ responses.
Methods
This was a retrospective study, which used a mixed methods digital ethnographic approach to analyse posts related to infant feeding methods that were made by seven South African Instagram influencers between the period of January 2018 to December 2020. Framing analysis was used to analyse qualitative data and quantitative data were analysed descriptively.
Results
From the 62 posts that were analysed, 27 were sponsored advertisements (some violating local regulations) and 35 posts promoted breastfeeding. The 18,333 follower comments and 918,299 likes in response to the posts were also analysed. We found that influencers presented BMS products as a solution for a child who cries a lot and has trouble sleeping. BMS were framed as helpful for children who are seemingly always hungry and dissatisfied with breastmilk alone. The study also found that some influencers promoted breastfeeding on their Instagram pages. Unlike BMS posts, breastfeeding posts were not sponsored. With a few exceptions, followers tended to support and reinforce the framing of influencers.
Conclusion
Stiffer regulations should be enforced against companies using influencers to promote infant formula and other BMS products, with proactive monitoring of social media. Professionals giving advice contrary to the guidelines from the WHO should be reported according to Regulation 991 and made accountable. Proactive engagement with Instagram influencers to promote breastfeeding should be considered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.
2. WHO | The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: report of the expert consultation. WHO. http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/WHO_NHD_01.09/en/. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.
3. Editorial Office, Department of Health. The Tshwane declaration of support for breastfeeding in South Africa. South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2011;24:214. http://www.sajcn.co.za/ndex.php/SAJCN/article/view/586. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.
4. National Department of Health, Statistics South Africa, South African Medical Research Council. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey. 2016. https://www.statssa.gov.za. Accessed 30 Nov 2022.
5. Halpern R, Coelho R. Excessive crying in infants. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016;92:S40–5.