Author:
Zabotti Benedetta,Buchini Sara,Milinco Mariarosa,Cattaneo Adriano,Pani Paola,Ronfani Luca
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Mothers’ Milk Tool, developed and launched by the Australian National University and Alive & Thrive in 2022, allows to estimate the volume and value of breastmilk using prevalence rates of breastfeeding by month of age from birth to 36 months. The objective of this study was to obtain these estimates for three cohort studies conducted in a region of Italy.
Methods
Breastfeeding data from three cohort studies carried out in 1999, 2007 and 2016, with follow-up to 12, 24 and 36 months of 842, 400 and 265 children, respectively, were entered into the downloadable version of the tool. Breastfeeding rates charts and tables with estimates of breastmilk production and value for breastfeeding of children aged 0–36 months were produced.
Results
The rates of initiation of breastfeeding were similar in the three cohorts, while the rates of any breastfeeding at subsequent ages increased over the years. The volumes and values of breastmilk per child increased accordingly, from around 130 L (13,000 USD) in 1999, to 200 L (20,000 USD) in 2007, to 226 L (22,600 USD) in 2016. The percentage of lost breastmilk decreased from 67.7% to 55.4% to 43.7%, respectively. Overall, the 1507 mothers of the three cohorts produced an estimated 250,000 L of breastmilk for their children aged 0–36 months. At 100 USD per litre, this would add up to around 25 million USD.
Conclusions
Our study shows that the Mothers’ Milk Tool can be used to estimate per child volumes and values of breastmilk produced and lost at local levels, and to provide simple indicators of the effects of breastfeeding interventions using the percentage of lost breastmilk, where datasets on rates of breastfeeding by month of age are available. The results of such studies can be used to advocate for better and adequately funded programmes for the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.
2. Meek JY, Noble L. and the Section on Breastfeeding of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Technical Report: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. Pediatrics. 2022;150:e2022057989.
3. Bartick MC, Jegier BJ, Green BD, Schwarz EB, Reinhold AG, Stuebe AM. Disparities in breastfeeding: impact on maternal and child health outcomes and costs. J Pediatr. 2017;181:49-55.e6.
4. Ahsan S, Jain S, Walters D. The global cost of not breastfeeding. Nutrition International and Alive&Thrive. 2022 https://www.aliveandthrive.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/CONBF%20Global%20Brief-v6%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2023
5. Smith JP. Counting the cost of not breastfeeding is now easier, but women’s unpaid health care work remains invisible. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34:479–81.