Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding practice among mothers in nine community health centres in Nanning city, China: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Li Jia,Zhao Chen,Wang Yan,Wang Yin P.,Chen Chun Y.,Huang Yue,Gao Ya Q.,Fang Jin,Zhou Hong

Abstract

Abstract Background The prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is suboptimal in China. There is limited evidence of effective interventions to increase EBF in China. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the potential factors that may be effective in promoting exclusive breastfeeding. Previous studies have mainly focused on socio-demographic factors and the Han ethnic group. This study explores more modifiable influencing factors of EBF in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China. Methods The cross-sectional data used in this study were collected to provide baseline information on EBF prevalence for a breastfeeding promotion project. A total of 494 mothers of infants aged 0–5 months were recruited from nine community health centres in Nanning, China, in October 2019. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Infant feeding was measured by 24-h recall. The Chinese version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale–Short Form was used to examine the maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine the factors associated with EBF practices. Results In the present study, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding was 37.0%. Higher breastfeeding self-efficacy scores (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25, 2.98), a college degree or above (AOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.24, 3.71), and early initiation of breastfeeding (AOR 2.06; 95% CI 1.29, 3.29) were positively associated with EBF practice. However, the preparation for infant formula before childbirth (AOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17, 0.52) and premature birth (AOR 0.30; 95% CI 0.10, 0.87) were negatively associated with EBF practice. Conclusions Exclusive breastfeeding practice was suboptimal and associated with various factors in the study area. The prevalence of EBF was positively associated with higher breastfeeding self-efficacy, education level of mothers, and early initiation of breastfeeding, whereas premature birth and preparation for infant formula before childbirth were barriers to exclusive breastfeeding. Future intervention projects should target mothers with premature babies, lower levels of education, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. Breastfeeding-friendly practices, such as the early initiation of breastfeeding and regulations on breastmilk substitutes, should also be encouraged.

Funder

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference55 articles.

1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–90. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673615010247, 10017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.

2. WHO & UNICEF. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. WHO. 2003. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241562218. Accessed 8 May 2019.

3. WHO. Infant and young child feeding: model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. World Heal. Organ. 2009. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44117. Accessed 8 May 2019.

4. Duan Y, Yang Z, Lai J, Yu D, Chang S, Pang X, Jiang S, Zhang H, Bi Y, Wang J, Scherpbier R, Zhao L, Yin S Exclusive breastfeeding rate and complementary feeding indicators in China: a national representative survey in 2013. Nutrients. 2018;10:249. http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/10/2/249, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020249.

5. Center for Health Statistics and Information at Ministry of Health of People’s Republic of China. An Analysis Report of National Health Services Survey in China, 2008. Beijing; 2009. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-02/27/content_1245006.htm. Accessed 8 May 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3