Facilitators, barriers, and key influencers of breastfeeding among low birthweight infants: a qualitative study in India, Malawi, and Tanzania

Author:

Vesel Linda,Benotti Emily,Somji Sarah,Bellad Roopa M,Charantimath Umesh,Dhaded Sangappa M,Goudar Shivaprasad S,Karadiguddi Chandrashekhar,Mungarwadi Geetanjali,Vernekar Sunil S,Kisenge Rodrick,Manji Karim,Salim Nahya,Samma Abraham,Sudfeld Christopher R,Hoffman Irving F,Mvalo Tisungane,Phiri Melda,Saidi Friday,Tseka Jennifer,Tsidya Mercy,Caruso Bethany A,Duggan Christopher P,Israel-Ballard Kiersten,Lee Anne CC,Mansen Kimberly L,Martin Stephanie L,North Krysten,Young Melissa F,Fishman Eliza,Fleming Katelyn,Semrau Katherine EA,Spigel Lauren,Tuller Danielle E,Henrich Natalie

Abstract

Abstract Background Low birthweight (LBW) infants are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Exclusive breastfeeding up to six months is recommended to help them thrive through infection prevention, growth improvements, and enhancements in neurodevelopment. However, limited data exist on the feeding experiences of LBW infants, their caregivers and key community influencers. The qualitative component of the Low Birthweight Infant Feeding Exploration (LIFE) study aimed to understand practices, facilitators, and barriers to optimal feeding options in the first six months for LBW infants in low-resource settings. Methods This study was conducted in four sites in India, Malawi, and Tanzania from July 2019 to August 2020. We conducted 37 focus group discussions with mothers and family members of LBW infants and community leaders and 142 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers, government officials, and supply chain and donor human milk (DHM) experts. Data were analyzed using a framework approach. Results All participants believed that mother’s own milk was best for LBW infants. Direct breastfeeding was predominant and feeding expressed breast milk and infant formula were rare. DHM was a new concept for most. Adequate maternal nutrition, lactation support, and privacy in the facility aided breastfeeding and expression, but perceived insufficient milk, limited feeding counseling, and infant immaturity were common barriers. Most believed that DHM uptake could be enabled through community awareness by overcoming misconceptions, safety concerns, and perceived family resistance. Conclusion This study fills an evidence gap in LBW infant feeding practices and their facilitators and barriers in resource-limited settings. LBW infants face unique feeding challenges such as poor latching and tiring at the breast. Similarly, their mothers are faced with numerous difficulties, including attainment of adequate milk supply, breast pain and emotional stress. Lactation support and feeding counseling could address obstacles faced by mothers and infants by providing psychosocial, verbal and physical support to empower mothers with skills, knowledge and confidence and facilitate earlier, more and better breast milk feeding. Findings on DHM are critical to the future development of human milk banks and highlight the need to solicit partnership from stakeholders in the community and health system.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference66 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Children: improving survival and well-being. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality. Accessed 15 Sep 2021.

2. UNICEF, Under-five. mortality. 2021. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/under-five-mortality/. Accessed 13 Sep 2021.

3. UNICEF, Neonatal. mortality. 2020. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/. Accessed 13 Sep 2021.

4. United Nations. The 17 Goals. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 15 Sep 2021.

5. UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group. Child mortality report 2020. United Nation Children’s Fund; 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3