Author:
Kersten Maren,Vincent-Höper Sylvie,Wirth Tanja,Gregersen Sabine,Nienhaus Albert
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Employees in social work exhibit high rates of sick leave due to mental health issues. Additionally, work-related demands in youth welfare have increased in recent years. Particularly in light of the escalating shortage of skilled professionals in this field, this trend becomes especially critical. The aim of this study is to systematically examine health-relevant working conditions, coping strategies, and health indicators in youth welfare. A special focus is placed on a differentiated analysis of job-related characteristics in the context of outpatient and residential youth welfare.
Methods
Mean values, standard deviations and the reliability of scales are measured. In addition to descriptive statistics, t-tests for analyzing mean differences, as well as correlation analyses and odds ratios as measures of association, are computed.
Results
A total of N = 1044 employees in youth welfare participated in the online survey. Among them, 671 individuals belonged to the field of residential youth welfare, and 373 to outpatient youth welfare. The results indicate that, in youth welfare in general, a variety of emotional, social, qualitative, and quantitative demands exhibit high levels. The comparison between outpatient and residential youth welfare reveals differences in half of the demands. The significant differences are observed for social demands and aggression from clients, which are statistically significant higher in the residential setting. Regarding resources, the most significant difference is observed for autonomy, which is higher in the outpatient setting. Overall, the association patterns reveals more similarities than differences between outpatient and residential settings. In both settings working conditions seem to have deteriorated during the pandemic.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the identified job-related characteristics in outpatient and residential youth welfare exhibit more similarities than differences. Nevertheless, the identified differences provide insights into the specific features of each work context, offering valuable starting points for targeted health promotion in practice.
Trial registration
This trial is recorded at the Hamburg University Ethics Committee (AZ 2022_027).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Wirth T, Mette J, Prill J, Harth V, Nienhaus A. Working conditions, mental health and coping of staff in social work with refugees and homeless individuals: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27:e257–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12730
2. Habermann-Horstmeier L, Limbeck K. Arbeitsklima in Behinderten-Wohneinrichtungen in Deutschland. ASU Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. 2016;51:50–63.
3. Lengen JC, Kersten M, Gregersen S. Ambulante Jugendhilfe: Ein systematisches Literatur-Review Zur Arbeits- Und Gesundheitssituation. Z Arb Wiss. 2020;75:86–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-020-00239-2
4. Deutscher Berufsverband für Soziale Arbeit e.V. Deutschsprachige Definition Sozialer Arbeit [Internet]. 2016 [cited 29 Apr 2024]. https://www.dbsh.de/profession/definition-der-sozialen-arbeit/deutsche-fassung.html
5. Eichhorn A, Corona. Soziale Arbeit Und die Systemrelevanz - Reflexionen über ein kontroverses etikett und mögliche Implikationen für die Soziale Arbeit. In: Lutz R, Steinhaußen J, Kniffki J, editors. Corona, Gesellschaft Und Soziale Arbeit. Neue Perspektiven Und Pfade. Weinheim: Beltz Juventus; 2021. pp. 182–92.