Abstract
Abstract
Background
The workloads of emergency physicians are severe. The prevalence of burnout among emergency physicians is higher than with other physicians or compared to the general population. The analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) is a valid method for objective monitoring of workload. The aim of this paper is to systematically evaluate the literature on heart rate variability as an objective indicator for mental stress of emergency physicians.
Methods
A systematic literature review examining heart rate variability of emergency physicians in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement for reporting systematic reviews was performed. PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Libary, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases were used. The methodological quality was evaluated by using a modified STARD for HRV.
Results
Two studies matched the inclusion criteria by using HRV between alert intervention and two other studies were considered that used HRV in other question areas. It showed an adaptation of HRV under stress. The studies were not comparable.
Conclusions
There is a need for occupational health studies that examine strains and stress of emergency physicians. The well-established parasympathetic mediated HRV parameters seem to be suitable parameters to objectify the stress.
Funder
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Toxicology
Reference48 articles.
1. Darius S, Balkaner B, Böckelmann I. Psychische Beeinträchtigungen infolge erhöhter Belastungen bei Notärzten. Notfall Rettungsmed. 2020;24(2):143–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-020-00696-6.
2. Sefrin P. Leistungsanalyse des Rettungsdienstes 2016/2017. Der Notarzt. 2020;36:320.
3. Prause G, Orlob S, Auinger D, Eichinger M, Zoidl P, Rief M, et al. System and skill utilization in an Austrian emergency physician system: retrospective study. [system- und Fertigkeitseinsatz in einem österreichischen Notarztsystem: retrospektive Studie]. Anaesthesist. 2020;69(10):733–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00820-8.
4. Leedal JM, Smith AF. Methodological approaches to anaesthetists’ workload in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(6):702–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei131.
5. Rohmert W, Rutenfranz J. Arbeitswissenschaftliche Beurteilung der Belastung und Beanspruchung an unterschiedlichen industriellen Arbeitsplätzen. Bonn: Bundesminister für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit; 1975.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献