Abstract
AbstractIn June of 2019, a working group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] concluded that “night shift work” is probably carcinogenic to humans (a Group 2A carcinogen). This was based on sufficient evidence of cancer and strong mechanistic evidence in experimental animals and limited evidence from human epidemiological studies. The biological basis from experimental work is clear and compelling: Disturbed chronobiology such as due to alterations in the light-dark schedule which shift-workers experience is associated with carcinogenicity. But is it correct to assume in epidemiological studies that “night shift work” provides the same dose of disturbed chronobiology to all night workers and that disturbed chronobiology from activities outside of work does not count? Both chronobiological theory and supporting evidence suggest that much-needed future epidemiology should address these questions and should consider disturbed chronobiology in all walks of life.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Toxicology
Reference23 articles.
1. Doll R. Introduction and overview. . JM EbS, editor: Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York-Basel-Hong Kong; 1994.
2. IARC. Monographs Vol 124 group. Carcinogenicity of night shift work. Lancet Oncol. 2019;Jul 4.
3. Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, et al. Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(12):1065–6.
4. Travis RC, Reeves GK, Peto R, Key TJ, Beral V. Response. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(4).
5. IARC. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans PREAMBLE; France Amended January 2019. 2019.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献