Author:
Erren Thomas C,Koch Melissa S,Meyer-Rochow V Benno
Abstract
Abstract
Common sense [CS], especially that of the non-scientist, can have predictive power to identify promising research avenues, as humans anywhere on Earth have always looked for causal links to understand, shape and control the world around them. CS is based on the experience of many individuals and is thus believed to hold some truths. Outcomes predicted by CS are compatible with observations made by whole populations and have survived tests conducted by a plethora of non-scientists. To explore our claim, we provide 4 examples of empirical insights (relevant to probably all ethnic groups on Earth) into causal phenomena predicted by CS: (i) “humans must have a sense of time”, (ii) “at extreme latitudes, more people have the winter blues”, (iii) “sleep is a cure for many ills” and (iv) “social networks affect health and disease”. While CS is fallible, it should not be ignored by science – however improbable or self-evident the causal relationships predicted by CS may appear to be.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Complementary and alternative medicine,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Cultural Studies,Health (social science)
Reference114 articles.
1. Pepinsky PN: Worlds of common sense: equality, identity, and Two modes of impulse management. 1994, Westport: Greenwood Press
2. Redekop BW: Common sense in philosophical and scientific perspective. Manag Decis. 2009, 47 (3): 399-412. 10.1108/00251740910946679.
3. Wierzbicka A: Experience, evidence and sense: the hidden cultural legacy of English. 2010, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Goddard J, Eccles T: Uncommon sense, common nonsense. 2012, Exmouth: Profile Books Ltd.
5. Aussie method for snakebite. http://www.socnet.com/archive/index.php/t-109668.html,
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献