Abstract
Abstract
Background
Young people’s processes of meaning-making in relation to what it means to live well are supported by the shared understandings of the good life that are available in their particular sociocultural and historical contexts. These understandings are tied to questions of environmental impact and social justice, as each ‘good life’ entails different levels of material throughput and some may undermine the ability of others to pursue their chosen ‘good lives’. This paper draws on the insights from an exploration of Instagram posts tagged #goodlife to consider the role of Instagram in the constitution of good life narratives that are available to young people. Using network analysis tools, the researchers analyse the relationships between themes of hashtags appearing on 793 posts tagged #goodlife. The findings from the thematic approach to network analysis are used to support a thematic qualitative exploration of a subsample of 200 of the posts.
Findings
The paper gives an overview of three good life narratives that can be found on the platform: the good life of the self-made affluent entrepreneur, the good life of the world-traveller, the good life as shared experience. Additionally, it highlights the differing levels of popularity of each narrative on the platform, and considers their respective implications for environmental and social sustainability. The paper then provides a conceptual reading of the platform that enables considerations relating to its place in the creation and maintenance of good life narratives. Conceptualising Instagram as a social conversation, the paper suggests that adequate participation on the platform may require engaging in less sustainable practices.
Conclusions
The paper concludes by arguing that while the most popular narratives on the platform are less likely to support sustainable lifestyles, more sustainable understandings of living well are also promoted by users.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Allesina S, Bodini A, Bondavalli C. Secondary extinctions in ecological networks: bottlenecks unveiled. Ecol Model. 2006;194:150–61.
2. Araujo CS, Damilton Corrêa LP, Coito da Silva AP, Prates RO, Meira W. ‘It’s not just a picture: revealing some user practices in Instagram. In: Proceedings of the 9th Latin American web congress; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWeb.2014.12.
3. BBC. Secrets of the multi-level millionaires: Ellie undercover; 2019. Accessed 09/07/19: https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p076n2hg/secrets-of-the-multilevel-millionaires-ellie-undercover/.
4. Belk R, Hsiu-Yen Y. Tourist photographs: signs of the self. Int J Culture Tourism Hospitality Res. 2011;5(4):345–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506181111174628.
5. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 843–60.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献