Abstract
AbstractAssessing the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of food production is imperative for aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda and adhering to evolving regulatory and strategic frameworks. The absence of a standardized methodology for quantifying sustainability in the agri-food system value chain necessitates the development of an effective approach. This study proposes a comprehensive methodological framework for quantifying the sustainability of agriculture, livestock, and the agri-food industry. The proposed methodology is based on the consensus achieved by a panel of experts using the Delphi methodology. The study emphasizes the identification of activities requiring corrective measures to enhance sustainability within the circular economy principles. The proposed model incorporates 70 indicators, with a particular emphasis on environmental indicators, aligning with the consensus of the expert panel. The resulting composite indicator and the accompanying battery of indicators provide a nuanced understanding of agribusiness sustainability. The study's findings underscore the need for prioritizing environmental considerations in evaluating agribusiness sustainability. The proposed model facilitates the formulation of actionable plans to enhance the viability of agribusinesses, enabling their adaptation to the evolving social and political landscape. This adaptation is crucial in meeting the contemporary demand for a reduction in the environmental footprint associated with food production and transformation. The developed methodology contributes to the harmonization of sustainability assessment practices, fostering a more comprehensive and standardized approach across the agri-food sector.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference86 articles.
1. Abram NK, Meijaard E, Wilson KA, Davis JT, Wells JA, Ancrenaz M, Budiharta S, Durrant A, Runting RK, Gaveau D, Mengersen K (2017) Oil palm—community Conflict mapping in Indonesia: a case for better community liaison in planning for development initiatives. Appl Geogr 78:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.10.005
2. Alcon F, Zabala A (2022) Assessment of social demand heterogeneity to inform agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation policies. Ecol Econ 191(August 2021):107216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107216
3. Ayompe LM, Schaafsma M, Egoh BN (2021) Towards sustainable palm oil production: the positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. J Clean Prod 278:123914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123914
4. Bajardí-Azcárate I, Esteve P, Blanco G, Sanz C, Lassaletta L, Villacorta C, Aguilera E, Soriano B (2022) Indicadores de Sostenibilidad En El Sector Agroalimentario. Cajamar Caja Rural, Almería, España
5. Bao B, Jiang A, Jin S (2022) What drives the fluctuations of ‘green’ development in china’s agricultural sector? An entropy method approach. Pol J Environ Stud 31(4):3491–3507. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/147135