Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the study has been to understand the stakeholders’ stance, with respect to the different stages of Porter’s value chain, to learn what activities could create the most value to the future competitiveness of the Italian aromatic sector. The main challenges faced by stakeholders and possible future strategies have been investigated. A survey, consisting of four subsequent phases: creation of a focus group, identification of actors and experts, gathering of data, and processing of the data using descriptive statistics and Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), has been performed. The stakeholders agreed that the Italian aromatic sector needs to enhance its value chain, but there is a polarisation of importance especially towards processors and retailers. Processors consider operations and outbound logistics as the most relevant primary activities, while retailers consider marketing and sales. Firm infrastructure and technology development are the more relevant support activities for retailers, while human resource management for processors. Farmers are apprehensive of imports, while processors agree that priority should be given to the bargaining power of retailers. Training of professionals emerges as an important future strategy to improve the extended value chain of the sector. The article investigates the extended value chain of the aromatic plant sector, according to Porter's model, in combination with a multivariate explorative tool (MCA). The results represent preliminary insights that can be used to diversify the role and sensitivity of different stakeholders, with respect to supply chain competitiveness and innovation.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Torino
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference86 articles.
1. Abdi H, Valentin D (2007) Multiple correspondence analysis. Encycl Measure Stat 2(4):651–657
2. Allen BL, Larson K, Grude-Schuck N (2004) Focus group fundamentals. J Extens 42(4):24
3. Alonso-Muñoz S, González-Sánchez R, Siligardi C, García-Muiña FE (2022) Analysis of the textile supply chain from a circularity perspective: a case study. Eurasian studies in business and economics, vol 21. Springer, New York, pp 213–234 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94036-2_12
4. Anderson AR, el Harbi S, Brahem M (2012) The Tunisian textile industry: local responses to internationalisation. Eur J Int Manag 6(5):525–541. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2012.049640
5. Atasu A, Subramanian R (2012) Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility? Prod Oper Manag 21(6):1042–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01327.x
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献