Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated the consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for enriched snack product traits. Using a choice experiment framework, we generated 8400 observations from a random sample of 700 respondents in Shashamanne and Hawassa city administrations. Taste parameters and heterogeneities were estimated using the generalized multinomial logit (G-MNL) model. The results reveal nutrition and/or health claim labeling is the most influential trait on the consumers’ decision to buy enriched snack products followed by mango flavor, sorghum chickpea main ingredient, price, and mixed shape. The WTP estimates show that consumers are willing to pay a premium for nutrition and/or health claim labeling equal to 1.43, 1.6, and 8.03 times higher than for a change in the flavor of the products from tomato to mango, the improvement of main ingredients to sorghum chickpea, and change of the product shape from spherical to mixed shape, respectively. The heterogeneities (variations) around the mean taste parameters were partially explained by sex, family size, and educational levels of the respondents. Generally, the consumers in the study areas prefer buying sorghum chickpea main ingredients, a combination of different shapes (mixed shape), mango flavored, and nutrition and/or health claim-labeled enriched snack products. Therefore, we suggest designing and implementing innovative ways of promoting snack products to urban communities with a deliberate focus on these traits to create a snack with the best combination. Given the high literacy of urban consumers and influential role of nutrition and/or health claim labeling trait on consumers’ decision, the trait-based promotion and marketing of the products constitute the right strategy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference43 articles.
1. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, 2016. Market Access Secretariat, Global Analysis Report, Sector Trend Analysis of Snack Foods in United States.
2. Blamey R, Louviere JJ, Bennett J (2001) Choice set design in the choice modeling. Transp Res B 37:837–855
3. Boere A (2015) Business Opportunities Report Oilseeds and pulses in the series written for the Ethiopian Netherlands business event 5-6 November 2015. Rijswijk, The Netherlands
4. Bonilla T (2010) Analysis of consumer preferences toward 100% fruit juice packages and labels. MSc. Thesis. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, p 111
5. Cattin P, Wittink D (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: a survey. J Mark 46:44–53
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献