Carer preferences of route of administration of transmucosal diamorphine and willingness to take part in a randomised controlled trial: an interview study (DIPPER)

Author:

Jamieson LizORCID,Harrop EmilyORCID,Liossi ChristinaORCID,Boyce Katherine,Mitchell Lorraine,Johnson Margaret,Jani YoginiORCID,Akinyooye Victoria,Skene Simon S.ORCID,Wong Ian C. K.ORCID,Howard Richard F.ORCID,Oulton KateORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Children and young people are usually given liquid morphine by mouth for breakthrough pain, which can take thirty minutes to work. A faster-acting, quickly absorbed, needle-free pain medicine, that is easy to administer is needed such as transmucosal (sublingual, buccal, intranasal) diamorphine. Research evidence relating to the administration of medication for breakthrough pain in children and young people is limited. This study aims to describe the experiences and preferences of parents and/or children and young people regarding the route of administration of diamorphine, barriers and facilitators comparative to oral morphine, and participation in a randomised controlled trial. Methods In-depth, semi-structured interviews with parents and/or children and young people at home or hospital/hospice. Results Thirteen interviews with: nine mothers, one father, and three sets of parents jointly. No interviews took place with a child/young person. Most families had experience of the buccal route which was effective in ease of administration and time to control pain. The intranasal route was preferred by parents irrespective of experience. Parents’ willingness for their child to take part in a trial depended on the time commitment, their child’s pain trajectory and the stability of analgesic requirements. Conclusion A randomised controlled trial of oral morphine versus transmucosal diamorphine would need to consider trial logistics, especially time commitment. Parents felt that the trial should be introduced initially by the clinical team, with written information from the research team, and sufficient time to ask questions. Patients who had discontinued oral morphine because of side effects, or those with gastrointestinal failure, should be excluded. Maintaining stability in pain management was essential to families, so the timing of the trial is a potential issue.

Funder

Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Fraser LK, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, Norman P, Parslow RC. Estimating the current and future prevalence of lifelimiting conditions in children in England. Palliat Med. 2021;35(9):1641–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216320975308.

2. The Association of Paediatric Palliative Medicine Master Formulary 5th edition 2020. https://www.appm.org.uk/guidelines-resources/appm-master-formulary/

3. Jamieson L, Wong IC, Craig F, Christiansen N, Brombley K, Tuleu C, Harrop E. Palliative medicines for children - a new frontier in paediatric research. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;69(4):377–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12615. Epub 2016 Oct 13 PMID: 27739059.

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. End of life care for infants, children and young people: planning and management (NICE Guideline NG61),  https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng61/evidence/full-guidancepdf-2728081261 (Acccessed 22/06/20)

5. Lofland J, Lofland H. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont CA: Wadsworth; 1995.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Morphine;Reactions Weekly;2022-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3