Treatment of agitation in terminally ill patients with intranasal midazolam versus subcutaneous midazolam: study protocol for a randomised controlled open-label monocentric trial (MinTU Study)
-
Published:2024-01-03
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-684X
-
Container-title:BMC Palliative Care
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Palliat Care
Author:
Hirschinger Hanna,Jaeger Evelyn,Nittka Stefanie,Hetjens Svetlana,Lorenz Christine,Remi Constanze,Saussele Susanne,Hofmann Wolf-K.,Gencer Deniz,Boch Tobias
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Intranasal (i.n.) drug application is a widely known and low-invasive route of administration that may be able to achieve rapid symptom control in terminally ill patients. According to the German S3 guideline “Palliative care for patients with incurable cancer”, benzodiazepines, such as midazolam, are recommended for the treatment of terminal agitation. To the best of our knowledge there is no evidence for i.n. midazolam in terminally ill patients. We aim to assess the use of i.n. midazolam as an alternative to subcutaneous administration of the drug.
Methods
In this monocentric, randomised, controlled, open-label investigator initiated trial, n = 60 patients treated at the palliative care unit of a University Hospital will be treated with 5 mg midazolam i.n. versus 5 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) midazolam in the control arm when terminal agitation occurs (randomly assigned 1:1). The estimated recruitment period is 18 months. Treatment efficacy is defined as an improvement on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (Palliative Version) (RASS-PAL) and a study specific numeric rating scale (NRS) before and after drug administration. Furthermore, plasma concentration determinations of midazolam will be conducted at t1 = 0 min, t2 = 5 min, and t3 = 20 min using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of midazolam i.n. in comparison to midazolam s.c. for the treatment of agitation in terminally ill patients.
Discussion
Midazolam i.n. is expected to achieve at least equivalent reduction of terminal agitation compared to s.c. administration. In addition, plasma concentrations of midazolam i.n. are not expected to be lower than those of midazolam s.c. and the dynamics of the plasma concentration with an earlier increase could be beneficial.
Trial registration
German Clinical Trials Registry DRKS00026775, registered 07.07.2022, Eudra CT No.: 2021-004789-36.
Funder
Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Nauck F. Symptomkontrolle in Der Sterbephase. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:1086–91.
2. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. Erweiterte S3 Leitlinie Palliativmedizin für Patienten Mit Einer Nicht-Heilbaren Krebserkrankung. Version 2.2 ed. Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Palliativmedizin e.V.; 2020.
3. Bausewein C, Roller S, Voltz R. Leitfaden Palliative Care - Palliativmedizin und Hospizbegleitung. 6 ed. München: ELSEVIER; 2018.
4. Bausewein C, Rémi C. Zum Umgang Mit off-label-use in Der Palliativmedizin. 2 ed: Kompetenzzentrum Palliativpharmazie Mit Zentralstelle off-label-use Klinik Und Poliklinik für Palliativmedizin. LMU Klinikum München; 2020.
5. Hagemann V, Bausewein C, Rémi C. Drug use beyond the licence in palliative care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021:1–7.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献