Barriers to recruitment into emergency department-initiated palliative care: a sub-study of a multi-site, randomized controlled trial

Author:

Brickey Julia,Flannery Mara,Cuthel AllisonORCID,Cho Jeanne,Grudzen Corita R.,Blaum Caroline,Southerland Lauren,Bischof Jason,Ouchi Kei,Elie Marie-Carmelle,Swor Robert,Jubanyik Karen,Goldfeld Keith S.,Cohen Susan E.,Kim Arum,Lowy Joseph,Scherer Jennifer S.,Bael Nancy E.,Gafford Ellin,Lakin Joshua,Barker Paige,Chmielewski Angela,Kapo Jennifer,Rubin Ada L.,Castro Isabel,Caplan Holden,Randhawa Simar Kaur,Carpenter Jordan,Theroux Gary,Murray Rebecca,Stuecher Laura,Daut Nora,Bonito Jennifer,Bakitas Marie,Batra Romilla,Booker-Vaughns Juanita,Chan Garrett K.,Dionne-Odom J. Nicholas,Dunn Patrick,Galvin Robert,Hopkins Ernest A.,Isaacs Eric David,Kizzie-Gillet Constance L.,Maguire Margaret M.,Pidatala Neha Reddy,Rosini Dawn,Vaughan William K.,Welsh Sally,Williams Pluscedia G.,Young-Brinn Angela,Navarro Martha,

Abstract

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) visits among older adults are common near the end of life. Palliative care has been shown to reduce ED visits and to increase quality of life among patients, but recruitment into these programs is often challenging. This descriptive analysis explores the barriers to enrolling seriously ill patients scheduled for discharge from the ED into palliative care research. Methods This descriptive sub-study aims to assess the reasons why patients with advanced illness scheduled for discharge home from 11 EDs across the United States decline to participate in Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA), a Phase IV randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two modes of palliative care delivery. Our aim was to understand why patients decline to enroll to improve future recruitment rates and expand care for patients discharged home from the ED. Research coordinators documented reasons that patients declined to enroll in the larger EMPallA trial; reasons for refusing participation were independently analyzed by two researchers to identify overarching themes. Results Enrollment rate across all sites was 45%; of the 504 eligible patients who declined participation, 47% (n = 237) declined for reasons related to illness severity. 28% of refusals (n = 143) were related to the mode of palliative care delivery, while 24% (n = 123) were due to misconceptions or stigma related to palliative care. Less commonly, patients refused due to general research barriers (16.5%), family/caregiver barriers (11.7%), and physician-related barriers (< 1%). Conclusions Patients with advanced illnesses presenting to the ED often refuse to participate in palliative care research due to the severity of their illness, the mode of care delivery, and misconceptions about palliative care. In contrast with other studies, our study found minimal physician gatekeeping, which may be the result of both changing attitudes toward palliative care and the nature of the ED setting. Robust training programs are crucial to overcome these misconceptions and to educate patients and providers about the role of palliative care. Future palliative care programs and study designs should recognize the burden this vulnerable population endures and consider alternative modes of care delivery in an effort to increase participation and enrollment. Clinical trials registration NCT03325985, October 30, 2017.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3