Author:
Zhu Nanxi,Yang Liu,Wang Xianlin,Tuo Jinmei,Chen Liuliu,Deng Renli,Kwan Rick Yiu Cho
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Life-limited patients may lose decision-making abilities during disease progression. Advance care planning can be used as a discussion method for healthcare professionals to understand patients’ future care preferences. However, due to many difficulties, the participation rate of healthcare professionals in advance care planning is not high.
Aim
To explore the facilitators of and barriers to healthcare professionals’ provision of advance care planning to life-limited patients to better implement it for this population.
Methods
We followed ENTREQ and PRISMA to guide this study. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, and SinoMed to include qualitative data on the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals in different professional fields in providing advance care planning for life-limited patients. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
Results
A total of 11 studies were included. Two themes were identified: unsupported conditions and facilitative actions. Healthcare professionals regarded cultural concepts, limited time, and fragmented record services as obstacles to implementation. They had low confidence and were overly concerned about negative effects. They needed to possess multiple abilities, learn to flexibly initiate topics, and facilitate effective communication based on multidisciplinary collaboration.
Conclusion
Healthcare professionals need an accepting cultural environment to implement advance care planning, a sound legal system, financial support, and a coordinated and shared system to support them. Healthcare systems need to develop educational training programs to increase the knowledge and skills of healthcare professionals and to promote multidisciplinary collaboration to facilitate effective communication. Future research should compare the differences in the needs of healthcare professionals in different cultures when implementing advance care planning to develop systematic implementation guidelines in different cultures.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Guizhou Education Science Planning project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Zwakman M, Jabbarian LJ, van Delden J, et al. Advance care planning: a systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness. Palliat Med. 2018;32:1305–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318784474
2. Palliative Care Australia. Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians. 2005. http://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/b0a6bd57-0ecb-45c6-9830-cf0c0c9ef059/16953.pdf.aspx?inline=true. Accessed 12 Jul 2022.
3. Milnes S, Orford NR, Berkeley L, et al. A prospective observational study of prevalence and outcomes of patients with Gold Standard Framework criteria in a tertiary regional australian hospital. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019;9:92–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000864
4. Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, et al. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50116.x
5. Martina D, Lin CP, Kristanti MS, et al. Advance care planning in Asia: a systematic narrative review of healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitude, and experience. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22:349.e1–349.e28.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献