Author:
Seiler Annina,Amann Manuel,Hertler Caroline,Christ Sebastian M.,Schettle Markus,Kaeppeli Barbara Meier,Jung-Amstutz Judith,Nigg Christel,Pestalozzi Bernhard C.,Imesch Patrick,Dummer Reinhard,Blum David,Jenewein Josef
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study extended the original Dignity Therapy (DT) intervention by including partners and family caregivers (FCs) of terminally-ill cancer patients with the overall aim of evaluating whether DT can mitigate distress in both patients nearing the end of life and their FCs.
Methods
In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT), a total of 68 patients with life expectancy < 6 months and clinically-relevant stress levels (Hospital Anxiety Depression total score; HADStot ≥ 8) including their FCs were randomly assigned to DT, DT + (including their FCs), or standard palliative care (SPC) in a 1:1:1 ratio. Study participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires pre- and post-intervention.
Results
The coalesced group (DT and DT +) revealed a significant increase in patients’ perceived quality of life (FACIT-Pal-14) following the intervention (mean difference 6.15, SD = 1.86, p < 0.01). We found a statistically significant group-by-time interaction effect: while the HADStot of patients in the intervention group remained stable over the pre-post period, the control group’s HADStot increased (F = 4.33, df = 1, 82.9; p < 0.05), indicating a protective effect of DT. Most patients and their FCs found DT useful and would recommend it to other individuals in their situation.
Conclusions
The DT intervention has been well-received and shows the potential to increase HRQoL and prevent further mental health deterioration, illness burden and suffering in terminally-ill patients. The DT intervention holds the potential to serve as a valuable tool for facilitating end-of-life conversations among terminally-ill patients and their FCs. However, the implementation of DT within the framework of a RCT in a palliative care setting poses significant challenges. We suggest a slightly modified and less resource-intensive version of DT that is to provide the DT inventory to FCs of terminally-ill patients, empowering them to ask the questions that matter most to them over their loved one’s final days.
Trial registration
This study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov -Protocol Record NCT02646527; date of registration: 04/01/2016). The CONSORT 2010 guidelines were used for properly reporting how the randomized trial was conducted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Al Yacoub R, Rangel AP, Shum-Jimenez A, Greenlee A, Yao Y, Schoppee TM, Fitchett G, Handzo G, Chochinov HM, Emanuel LL, Kittelson S, Wilkie DJ. Cost considerations for implementing dignity therapy in palliative care: insights and implications. Palliat Support Care. 2023;11:1–5.
2. Angermeyer MC, Kilian R, Matschinger H. WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-BREF: Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Version der WHO-Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualitat. Gottingen: Hogrefe; 2000.
3. Aoun SM, Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ. Dignity therapy for people with motor neuron disease and their family caregivers: a feasibility study. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(1):31–7.
4. Barclay L. In sickness and in dignity: a philosophical account of the meaning of dignity in health care. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;61:136–41.
5. Bell ML, Fiero M, Horton NJ, Hsu C-H. Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):118.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Einsamkeit am Lebensende;Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz;2024-08-23