Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Surrogate decision-making by family caregivers for patients with severe brain injury is influenced by the availability and understanding of relevant information and expectations for future rehabilitation. We aimed to compare the consistency of family caregivers’ perceptions with clinical diagnoses and to inform their expectation of prognosis in the future.
Methods
The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised was used to assess the diagnosis of inpatients with severe brain injury between February 2019 and February 2020. A main family caregiver was included per patient. The family caregiver’s perception of the patient’s consciousness and expectations of future recovery were collected through questionnaires and compared consistently with the clinical diagnosis.
Results
The final sample included 101 main family caregivers of patients (57 UWS, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, 37 MCS, minimally conscious state, 7 EMCS, emergence from MCS) with severe brain injury. Only 57 family caregivers correctly assessed the level of consciousness as indicated by the CRS-R, showing weak consistency (Kappa = 0.217, P = 0.002). Family caregivers’ demographic characteristics and CRS-R diagnosis influenced the consistency between perception and clinical diagnosis. Family caregivers who provided hands-on care to patients showed higher levels of consistent perception (AOR = 12.24, 95% CI = 2.06-73.00, P = 0.006). Compared to UWS, the family caregivers of MCS patients were more likely to have a correct perception (OR = 7.68, 95% CI = 1.34–44.06). Family caregivers had positive expectations for patients’ recovery in terms of both communication and returning to normal life.
Conclusion
Nearly half of family caregivers have inadequate understanding of their relative’s level of consciousness, and most of them report overly optimistic expectations that do not align with clinical diagnosis. Providing more medical information to family caregivers to support their surrogate decision-making process is essential.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Key Project Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Yang Y, Wang K, Zhou F, Zhang Y, Xia X, He Y, et al. Conditions of patients with chronic disorders of consciousness and caregiver’s attitude and pressure in three cities in China. J Clin Neurosurg. 2017;14(02):102–6.
2. Bateman DE. Neurological assessment of coma. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2001;71 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i13–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.suppl_1.i13.
3. Bernat JL. Chronic consciousness disorders. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:381–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.060107.091250.
4. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, Leon-Carrion J, Sannita WG, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-68.
5. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.