Author:
Schnakenberg Rieke,Fassmer Alexander Maximilian,Allers Katharina,Hoffmann Falk
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Most care-dependent people live at home, where they also would prefer to die. Unfortunately, this wish is often not fulfilled. This study aims to investigate place of death of home care recipients, taking characteristics and changes in care settings into account.
Methods
We retrospectively analysed a cohort of all home-care receiving people of a German statutory health insurance who were at least 65 years and who deceased between January 2016 and June 2019. Next to the care need, duration of care, age, sex, and disease, care setting at death and place of death were considered. We examined the characteristics by place of care, the proportion of dying in hospital by care setting and characterised the deceased cohort stratified by their actual place of death.
Results
Of 46,207 care-dependent people initially receiving home care, 57.5% died within 3.5 years (n = 26,590; mean age: 86.8; 66.6% female). More than half of those moved to another care setting before death with long-term nursing home care (32.3%) and short-term nursing home care (11.7%) being the most frequent transitions, while 48.1% were still cared for at home. Overall, 36.9% died in hospital and in-hospital deaths were found most often in those still receiving home care (44.7%) as well as care in semi-residential arrangements (43.9%) at the time of death. People who died in hospital were younger (mean age: 85.5 years) and with lower care dependency (low care need: 28.2%) as in all other analysed care settings.
Conclusion
In Germany, changes in care settings before death occur often. The proportion of in-hospital death is particularly high in the home setting and in semi-residential arrangements. These settings should be considered in interventions aiming to decrease the number of unwished care transitions and hospitalisations at the end of life.
Funder
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10:430–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARR.2011.03.003.
2. Statistisches Bundesamt Destatis. Pflegestatistik - Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung Deutschlandergebnisse. (2019). 2020;49:46. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Gesundheit/Pflege/LaenderPflegebeduerftige.html;jsessionid=141B56B753D8BC10025F238DC5720E7F.cae1.
3. Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. Demografischer Wandel in Deutschland, Heft 2, Ausgabe 2010. 2010. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Demografischer-Wandel/Publikationen/Downloads/krankenhausbehandlung-pflegebeduerftige-5871102109004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 14 Dec 2021.
4. Statistisches Bundesamt Destatis. Pflegestatistik 2017- Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung. 2018. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Pflege/Publikationen/Downloads-Pflege/laender-pflegebeduerftige-5224002179004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
5. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In Search of a Good Death: Observations of Patients, Families, and Providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00011.