Author:
Walker Andreas,Breitsameter Christof
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Physicians who practice in a hospice are responsible for working with patients and nursing staff to develop a medication plan, monitor symptoms and pain, and adjust medication if necessary. In inpatient hospices in Germany, physicians are part of a multi-professional approach, but not part of the hospice team itself. However, there is no, or hardly any, literature on medical practice in a hospice setting. Therefore, we wanted to know how physicians reflect upon their role in hospice within a multi-professional setting, how they communicate with patients, relatives, nursing staff and other physicians, and what the limitations of these communication processes are.
Methods
By means of two qualitative studies we explored how physicians classify their activities as part of the hospice organization. The study design followed Grounded Theory procedures.
Results
The physicians named an appropriate interpretation of the patient's wishes as the challenge of everyday practice which can lead to differences of perspective with those involved: with nursing staff, who would prefer an alternative form of medication, with relatives, who do not accept that the patient refuses nutrition, with other physicians, who have a different opinion about appropriate treatment. For physicians, this is all the more challenging as communication with the patient becomes increasingly uncertain due to the patient’s illness. Again and again, medical measures have to be negotiated on several levels.
Conclusion
Multi-professional organizations that have to deal with differences in perspective handle them by clearly distinguishing areas of responsibility, an aspect that physicians also claim for themselves. For physicians the question arises repeatedly whether they have correctly interpreted the wishes of the patient. They must continuously reassure themselves of the patient's wishes and this presents them with communication challenges not only with the patient, but also with the nursing staff and relatives and, more recently, with their colleagues.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Radbruch L, Payne S. Board of Directors of the EAPC. White Paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1. Recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Eur J Palliative Care. 2009;16(6):278–89.
2. Marquard S, Garthaus M, Wendelstein B, et al. Konflikte am Lebensende. Erfahrungen in Pflegebeziehungen aus der Sicht schwer kranker und sterbender Menschen. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin. 2018;19(2):110–5.
3. Lindena G, Leiske M, Neuwöhner K, et al. Die Mitarbeiter- und Angehörigenzufriedenheit mit der Palliativversorgung Sterbender – Befragung im Rahmen der Hospiz- und Palliativ-Erfassung HOPE. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin. 2017;18(01):36–43.
4. von Schmude A, Kern M. Zufriedenheit von Mitarbeitern in Hospizarbeit und Palliativversorgung – eine quantitative Studie. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin. 2017;18(06):305–9.
5. Gray D, Hood H, Haworth G, Smyth C, et al. Hospital doctors’ experiences of caring for dying patients. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018;48(4):299–303.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献