Author:
Tang Shunxue,Okashah Rebecca A,Cordonnier-Pratt Marie-Michele,Pratt Lee H,Ed Johnson Virgil,Taylor Christopher A,Arnold Michael L,Knapp Steven J
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Limited DNA sequence and DNA marker resources have been developed for Iris (Iridaceae), a monocot genus of 200–300 species in the Asparagales, several of which are horticulturally important. We mined an I. brevicaulis-I. fulva EST database for simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and developed ortholog-specific EST-SSR markers for genetic mapping and other genotyping applications in Iris. Here, we describe the abundance and other characteristics of SSRs identified in the transcript assembly (EST database) and the cross-species utility and polymorphisms of I. brevicaulis-I. fulva EST-SSR markers among wild collected ecotypes and horticulturally important cultivars.
Results
Collectively, 6,530 ESTs were produced from normalized leaf and root cDNA libraries of I. brevicaulis (IB72) and I. fulva (IF174), and assembled into 4,917 unigenes (1,066 contigs and 3,851 singletons). We identified 1,447 SSRs in 1,162 unigenes and developed 526 EST-SSR markers, each tracing a different unigene. Three-fourths of the EST-SSR markers (399/526) amplified alleles from IB72 and IF174 and 84% (335/399) were polymorphic between IB25 and IF174, the parents of I. brevicaulis × I. fulva mapping populations. Forty EST-SSR markers were screened for polymorphisms among 39 ecotypes or cultivars of seven species – 100% amplified alleles from wild collected ecotypes of Louisiana Iris (I.brevicaulis, I.fulva, I. nelsonii, and I. hexagona), whereas 42–52% amplified alleles from cultivars of three horticulturally important species (I. pseudacorus, I. germanica, and I. sibirica). Ecotypes and cultivars were genetically diverse – the number of alleles/locus ranged from two to 18 and mean heterozygosity was 0.76.
Conclusion
Nearly 400 ortholog-specific EST-SSR markers were developed for comparative genetic mapping and other genotyping applications in Iris, were highly polymorphic among ecotypes and cultivars, and have broad utility for genotyping applications within the genus.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Lyte C, Maynard P, Ellis JR, Service N, Rix M, Grey-Wilson C, Dickson-Cohen VC, Linnegar S, Bowley ME, Blanco-White A, Cohen O, Davis A, Jury S, Innes C, Christiansen H, Mathew B, Killens WR, Waddick JW, King C: A Guide to Species Irises: Their Identification and Cultivation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge UniversityPress; 1997.
2. Arnold ML, Bennett BD, Zimmer EA: Natural hybridization between Iris fulva and Iris hexagona: pattern of ribosomal DNA variation. Evolution. 1990, 44: 1512-1521. 10.2307/2409333.
3. Mitra J: Karyotype analysis of Bearded Iris. Botanical Gazette. 1956, 117: 265-293. 10.1086/335916.
4. Randolph LF, Mitra J, Nelson IS: Cytotaxonomic studies of Louisiana Irises. Botanical Gazette. 1961, 123: 125-133. 10.1086/336137.
5. Rodionenko GI: The genus Iris L.: questions of morphology, biology, evolution, and systematics. London, United Kingdom: British Iris Society; 1987.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献