A content analysis of alignment messages to the Next Generation Science Standards

Author:

Tanas JamieORCID,Fulmer Gavin

Abstract

AbstractTeachers are a critical component to standards-based reform systems, which require that reforms conceived at the national level pass through several layers of the educational system before impacting learning in the classroom. The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are an example of this type of reform and pose significant challenges for alignment between levels given their three-dimensional nature alongside inclusion of ambitious and novel reform ideas. To examine translation of NGSS reforms across levels, we provide a content analysis of alignment messages conveyed to teachers through practitioner literature. Analysis indicates some coherence with national messaging around alignment to performance expectations and science and engineering practices. Additionally, alignment to broader reform ideas like engaging in science practices, integration, engineering, and focus on phenomena were represented to teachers. However, qualitative analysis of these representations indicate that reforms are often superficially portrayed, variably defined, or missing altogether. Findings indicate that teachers receive numerous messages regarding what it means to align to the NGSS and few elaborations on how to operationalize reforms. Our work suggests a need for intentional consideration of how to design representations for practitioners that consider teacher sensemaking around novel reforms. Additionally, we see a need for further development of coherence among the research community regarding alignment to the NGSS and agreement on definition of key reform ideas. Future work should consider how teachers use and understand these representations as they enact the NGSS in their local contexts.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference143 articles.

1. Achieve (2014). State Science Education Standards Comparison Tool (Version 1). https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Standards%20Comparison%20Tool%20July%201%202014.pdf

2. Achieve (2016). EQuIP rubric for lessons & units: science (Version 3.0). https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/EQuIPRubricforSciencev3.pdf

3. Achieve (2017). Primary evaluation of essential criteria (PEEC) for Next Generation Science Standards instructional materials design (Version 1.0). https://www.nextgenscience.org/peec

4. Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying Teachers’ sensemaking to Investigate Teachers’ responses to Professional Development focused on New Standards. J Teach Educ, 66(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646.

5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3